ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine
Observed and expected reliability of echocardiographic volumetric methods and critical change values for quantification of mitral regurgitant fraction in dogs.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison and Agreement of Echocardiographic Volumetric Methods for Quantifying Mitral Regurgitation in Dogs with Myxomatous Mitral Valve Disease.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Monoplane Simpson's Method Is Reliable for Left Atrial Volume Assessment in Small Dogs with Myxomatous Mitral Valve Disease.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Observed and expected reliability of echocardiographic volumetric methods and critical change values for quantification of mitral regurgitant fraction in dogs.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReliability of echocardiographic calculations for stroke volume and mitral regurgitant fraction (RF HYPOTHESIS: Observed intra- and interobserver accuracy and variability in healthy dogs help model CCV for RF ANIMALS: Reliability cohort of 34 healthy dogs; allometric scaling cohort of 99 dogs with heart disease and 25 healthy dogs.
methodsAccuracy, variability, and CCV of 2 observers using geometric and flow-based echocardiography were prospectively compared against a standard of RF
resultsAccuracy of methods to determine RF CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Echocardiographic volumetric methods used to calculate stroke volume and RF
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.