SynthesisCurrent diabetes reviews2025
Ultrasound Evaluations of Ankle and Foot Muscles in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Current diabetes reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is the prevalent microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). 30-50% of diabetics are likely to be affected by DPN. It significantly impacts the skeletal muscles, resulting in an accelerated loss of muscle mass. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the ankle and foot muscle changes in diabetic peripheral neuropathy using ultrasound.
methodA comprehensive search was conducted in Scopus, Embase, and PubMed databases, which yielded 64 studies, out of which 5 studies are included in this meta-analysis.
resultThe meta-analysis shows that the thickness and cross-section area of the extensor digitorum brevis muscle are reduced in DPN as compared to the control group with p-value<0.004 and p-value<0.001, respectively. The thickness of MIL muscle was also smaller in DPN p-value=0.02. Similarly, the thickness and CSA of AH muscle are also reduced in DPN patients compared to the control group, with p-values of 0.21 and 0.14.
conclusionMeta-analysis reveals that diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) patients have reduced foot muscle thickness and cross-sectional area (CSA) compared to controls without neuropathy. This highlights the importance of ultrasound in detecting muscle atrophy early in diabetic patients since it provides objective measures beyond traditional screening with its real-time and non-invasive nature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39328136What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.