Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39327996›Full record

Trial reportClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Impact of Estetrol Combined with Drospirenone on Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis in Patients with Endometriosis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study.

Takao Kobayashi, Masashi Hirayama, Masayoshi Nogami, Kanna Meguro, Masato Iiduka, Jean-Michel Foidart, Jonathan Douxfils, Tasuku Harada

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Hemostatic safety profile of estetrol vs. ethinylestradiol in oral contraceptives: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Takao KobayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hamamatsu Medical Center, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Masashi HirayamaDepartment of Clinical Development, Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0008-6217-167X
Masayoshi NogamiDepartment of Clinical Development, Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Kanna MeguroDepartment of Clinical Development, Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Masato IidukaDepartment of Clinical Development, Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Jean-Michel FoidartEstetra SRL, Mithra Pharmaceuticals, Liège, Belgium.
Jonathan DouxfilsFaculty of Medicine, Department of Pharmacy, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS), Clinical Pharmacology Research Group, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.
Tasuku HaradaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism is a serious safety concern in women using combined oral contraceptives; ethinyl estradiol (EE) is widely used as an estrogen. Estetrol (E4) is a native estrogen with selective tissue activity and exclusively produced by the fetal liver. This study used a multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group design to evaluate the effects of E4 combined with drospirenone (DRSP) on coagulation and fibrinolysis in Japanese patients with endometriosis. Participants were randomized to receive either E4 15 mg/DRSP 3 mg or EE 20 µg/DRSP 3 mg for 12 weeks. E4/DRSP and EE/DRSP were administered orally once a day in a cyclic regimen, ie, 24-day active use followed by a 4-day hormone-free period, and a flexible extended regimen, respectively, and blood coagulation and fibrinolysis markers were measured. The effect on coagulation and fibrinolysis was considerably less in the E4/DRSP group than in the EE/DRSP group. Major anticoagulant proteins, protein S (free, total) and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (free), were reduced following EE/DRSP treatment. Consequently, thrombin generation determined by the activated protein C sensitivity ratio was increased by approximately 4-fold in the EE/DRSP group than in the E4/DRSP group. Eventually, the fibrinolysis cascade was triggered to compensate for disturbed coagulation, and D-dimer levels were 4.7-fold higher in the EE/DRSP group than in the E4/DRSP group. This study demonstrated that the effect of E4/DRSP on the blood coagulation and fibrinolysis cascades was significantly less than that of EE/DRSP in participants with endometriosis, a disease of women of advanced and reproductive age (jRCT2080225090, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT2080225090).

Indexed as

AndrostenesBlood CoagulationEndometriosisEstetrolFibrinolysisAdultContraceptives, Oral, CombinedEthinyl EstradiolFemaleHumansAndrostenesContraceptives, Oral, CombineddrospirenoneEstetrolEthinyl Estradiolactivated protein C resistanceendometriosisestetrol/drospirenone combinationethinyl estradiol/drospirenone combinationvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID39327996
PMCPMC11452863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.