Trial reportAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2024
Eight-year efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide for treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: Final results from two randomised phase 3 trials.
Trial report in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) 25 mg QD Versus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) 300 mg QD for the Treatment of HBeAg-Negative, Chronic Hepatitis B
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) 25 mg QD Versus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) 300 mg QD for the Treatment of HBeAg-Positive, Chronic Hepatitis B
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- APASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of chronic hepatitis B infection: a 2026 update.Hepatology international · 2026Guideline
- Efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil in chronic hepatitis b: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of TDF, TAF, TMF, and TDF-to-TAF switch in chronic hepatitis B: a network meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- B/F/TAF in people with both HIV-1 and hepatitis B: outcomes from the ALLIANCE open-label extension phase.AIDS research and therapy · 2026Trial
- Eight-year efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide for treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: Final results from two randomised phase 3 trials.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2024Trial
- Antiviral Therapy and Post-Resection Outcomes in Patients With Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Article
- [Expert recommendations on the first-line use and optimization plan of nucleos(t)ide analogues in the context of functional cure for chronic hepatitis B].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026Article
- National guideline for hepatitis B elimination in Thailand: a decentralized health system model for expanding diagnosis and treatment.Hepatology international · 2026Article
- Prevalence of renal and bone risk factors and nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment among patients with chronic hepatitis B in the United States.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Article
- [APASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of chronic hepatitis B infection: a 2026 update].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026Article
- On-treatment viral factors affect subsequent hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance in patients treated with nucleos(t)ide analogs for > 10 years.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- KASL clinical practice guidelines for management of chronic hepatitis B Endorsed by the East Asia Liver Alliance (EALA).Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2026Article
- Review Article: Renal Safety Profiles of Tenofovir Alafenamide, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, and Entecavir for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Infection-General and Special Populations.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Eight-year Results from Two Randomized Phase 3 Trials of Tenofovir Alafenamide for Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection in China.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2026Article
- Novel insights into chronic HBV infection.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Article
- Chronic blood-borne viral hepatitis in a tertiary hospital in Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia: epidemiology, liver enzyme correlations, and treatment outcomes.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Mechanisms and management of pegylated interferon-α toxicity in chronic hepatitis B.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The clinical significance and optimization strategies of HBeAg seroclearance in chronic hepatitis B treatment.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Season-adjusted longitudinal changes in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D during pegylated interferon add-on to ongoing tenofovir alafenamide therapy in chronic hepatitis B: a real-world cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Renal function and urinary tubular biomarker abnormalities in untreated and entecavir- or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-treated patients with chronic hepatitis B: a retrospective cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn two phase 3 studies, tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) showed non-inferior efficacy versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), with more favourable renal and bone safety in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).
aimsHere, we report the studies' final 8-year results.
methodsCHB patients (hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg]-negative and HBeAg-positive) were randomised (2:1) to double-blind TAF 25 mg/day or TDF 300 mg/day for up to 3 years, followed by open-label (OL) TAF through year 8. Virological, biochemical, serological and fibrosis responses, and safety, including bone and renal parameters, were evaluated. Resistance to TAF was assessed annually by deep sequencing of polymerase/reverse transcriptase and by phenotyping.
resultsAmong 1298 patients randomised to double-blind TAF (n = 866) or double-blind TDF (n = 432), 775 in the TAF group and 382 in the TDF group received OL TAF, including 180 and 202 who switched from TDF to TAF at year 2 (TDF2y → TAF6y) or year 3 (TDF3y → TAF5y), respectively. At year 8, among patients in the TAF8y, TDF2y → TAF6y and TDF3y → TAF5y groups, 69%, 66% and 73% (missing-equals-failure analysis) and 95%, 94% and 97% (missing-equals-excluded) of patients, respectively, achieved HBV DNA <29 IU/mL. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (Cockcroft-Gault method; eGFR
conclusionLong-term TAF treatment exhibited favourable safety and tolerability with high rates of viral suppression and no development of resistance. CLINICALTRIALS: gov numbers NCT01940341 and NCT01940471.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.