Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39327707›Full record

Trial reportBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2025

PAX1/SOX1 DNA Methylation Versus Cytology and HPV16/18 Genotyping for the Triage of High-Risk HPV-Positive Women in Cervical Cancer Screening: Retrospective Analysis of Archival Samples.

Karen K L Chan, Stephanie S Liu, Lesley S K Lau, Siew Fei Ngu, Mandy M Y Chu, K Y Tse, Annie N Y Cheung, Hextan Y S Ngan

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. SOX1/PAX1 Methylation for Triage of HPV-Positive Women in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Cohort Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karen K L ChanDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4034-7469
Stephanie S LiuDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Lesley S K LauDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Siew Fei NguDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Mandy M Y ChuDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
K Y TseDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Annie N Y CheungDepartment of Pathology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Hextan Y S NganDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

Health and Medical Research Fund 19181142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the performance of cytology, HPV16/18 genotyping and PAX1/SOX1 methylation for the triage of high-risk HPV-positive cervical samples.

designRetrospective analyses of archival samples collected from a large-scale prospective randomised controlled trial. SETTING/SAMPLE: HPV-positive women recruited from the general cervical screening population.

methods403 HPV-positive samples including 113 normal, 173 low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (LG-CIN), 114 HG-CIN and three cervical cancers. All samples were assessed by liquid-based cytology, HPV genotyping and PAX1/SOX1 methylation.

main outcome measuresAUC (area under the curve), sensitivity and specificity for cytology, HPV16/18 genotyping and PAX1/SOX1 methylation for high-grade (HG) premalignant cervical lesions.

resultsPAX1 was more sensitive than cytology and HPV16/18 genotyping in detecting a HG lesion (CIN2+). The sensitivity for PAX1, SOX1, cytology and HPV16/18 were 73.5% (95% CI: 65.5-81.5), 41.9% (95% CI: 32.9-50.8), 48.7% (95% CI: 39.7-57.8) and 36.8% (95% CI: 28.0-45.5), respectively, and their respective specificities were 70.3% (95% CI: 65.0-75.6), 83.6% (95% CI: 79.3-87.9), 77.6% (95% CI: 72.8-82.5) and 67.1% (95% CI: 61.7-72.6), respectively. Overall, PAX1 gave the best AUC at 0.72. Adding SOX1 to PAX1 did not improve the AUC (0.68). Three hundred and twenty-two women who did not have a HG lesion at baseline were followed up for two rounds of screening. Fewer women developed a HG lesion with a normal baseline PAX1 compared to women with a normal baseline cytology or negative HPV16/18 (8.4% vs. 14.5% and 17.5%, respectively).

conclusionPAX1 triage for referral to colposcopy in HPV-positive women may be superior to cytology and HPV16/18 genotyping.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18Paired Box Transcription FactorsPapillomavirus InfectionsSOXB1 Transcription FactorsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGenotypeHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTriagePaired Box Transcription FactorsPAX1 transcription factorSOX1 protein, humanSOXB1 Transcription Factorscervical cytologycervical screeningHPV16/18 genotypingPAX1/SOX1 methylationtriage

Identifiers

PMID39327707
PMCPMC11625649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.