ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
Low-Dose Oral Minoxidil and Associated Adverse Events: Analyses of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) With a Focus on Pericardial Effusions.
Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of 5% Topical Minoxidil Application for Telogen Effluvium: An Open-Label Single-Arm Clinical Trial.The Journal of dermatology · 2025Trial
- Life-threatening toxicity after the ingestion of a topical minoxidil solution: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Article
- Topical Minoxidil and Low-Dose Oral Minoxidil in Onychodystrophy: A Proposed Treatment Algorithm.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular Safety Signals of Oral Versus Topical Minoxidil in FAERS: A Disproportionality Analysis (Analytic Cohort 2012-2025).Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Oral Minoxidil for Alopecia Treatment: Risks, Benefits, and Recommendations.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow-dose oral minoxidil (LDOM) is used to treat hair loss, but the literature on its safety profile is relatively sparse.
aimsUsing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, we determined signals for adverse events (AEs) with LDOM use.
methodsFour sets of case/noncase study disproportionality analyses were conducted to determine reporting odds ratio (ROR) for 10 AEs including pericardial effusion (PE). The oral minoxidil dose ranges were: (i) ≤1.25 mg (i.e., 0-1.25 mg), (ii) ≤2.5 mg (i.e., 0-2.5 mg), (iii) ≤5 mg (i.e., 0-5 mg), and (iv) ≤10 mg (i.e., 0-10 mg).
resultsFor ≤1.25 mg, we detected a signal for PE (ROR = 16.41, 95% CI: 2.29, 117.37, p < 0.05). For ≤2.5 mg, the analyses detected a signal for PE (ROR = 13.30, 95% CI: 5.96, 29.68, p < 0.05); the ROR in the absence of cardiac impairment was 5.34 (95% CI: 1.33, 21.37, p < 0.05); in the presence of cardiac impairment, the ROR was 49.42 (95% CI: 18.27, 133.66, p < 0.05). A signal for PE was also detected at ≤5 and ≤10 mg. For PE, there was a significant (p < 0.05) association with a patient outcome of "life threatening" only at the ≤10 mg dose range.
conclusionsOur study, the first FAERS-based signal detection study for LDOM, found significant associations between LDOM use and several AEs. In the absence of causal evidence, these correlations warrant more attention regarding safe use of LDOM. Until more safety data are available, we recommend using LDOM at the lowest effective dose (≤5 mg/day).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.