ArticleScientific reports2024
Deep residual 2D convolutional neural network for cardiovascular disease classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid Multi-Domain ECG Feature Learning with mRMR and CNN-Transformer for Cardiac Disease Classification.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An effective two-stage key frame extraction method for speech-visual emotion recognition.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Predicting complications and mortality in myocardial infarction patients using a graph neural network model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- An integrated algorithm for single lead electrocardiogram signal analysis using deep learning with 12-lead data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Fully Automated Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction Using Electrocardiograms and Multimodal Deep Learning.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) continues to be a major global health concern, underscoring the need for advancements in medical care. The use of electrocardiograms (ECGs) is crucial for diagnosing cardiac conditions. However, the reliance on professional expertise for manual ECG interpretation poses challenges for expanding accessible healthcare, particularly in community hospitals. To address this, there is a growing interest in leveraging automated and AI-driven ECG analysis systems, which can enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency, making quality cardiac care more accessible to a broader population. In this study, we implemented a novel deep two-dimensional convolutional neural network (2D-CNN) on a dataset of PTB-XL for cardiac disorder detection. The studies were performed on 2, 5, and 23 classes of cardiovascular diseases. The our network in classifying healthy/sick patients achived an AUC of 95% and an average accuracy of 87.85%. In 5-classes classification, our model achieved an AUC of 93.46% with an average accuracy of 89.87%. In a more complex scenario involving classification into 23 different classes, the model achieved an AUC of 92.18% and an accuracy of 96.88%. According to the experimental results, our model obtained the best classification result compared to the other methods based on the same public dataset. This indicates that our method can aid healthcare professionals in the clinical analysis of ECGs, offering valuable assistance in diagnosing CVD and contributing to the advancement of computer-aided diagnosis technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.