ArticleCurrent medical science2024
Functional Liver Imaging Score Derived from Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI Predicts Cachexia and Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.
Article in Current medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional liver imaging score in chronic liver disease: association with hepatocellular function and disease severity markers.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Do hepatic and biliary functional data from gadoxetate-enhanced MRI add value in predicting outcomes in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)?European radiology · 2026Article
- Hepatic enhancement and signal intensity analysis on magnetic resonance imaging as prognostic biomarkers in advanced chronic liver disease.World journal of hepatology · 2025Article
- Predicting the Occurrence of Cachexia in Patients with BCLC Stage B/C Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Systemic Therapy: A Nomogram Based on Common Clinical Parameters.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCachexia occurs in approximately half of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients as the disease progresses and is correlated with a poor prognosis. Therefore, early identification of HCC patients at risk of developing cachexia and their prognosis is crucial. This study investigated the functional liver imaging score (FLIS) derived from gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify cachexia in HCC patients and their prognosis.
methodsPretreatment clinical and MRI data from 339 HCC patients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI scans were retrospectively collected. Patient weights were recorded for 6 months following the MRI scan to diagnose cachexia. The FLIS was calculated as the sum of the enhancement quality score, the excretion quality score, and the portal vein sign quality score. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the significant factors affecting overall survival (OS). Multivariable logistic regression was then conducted to identify variables predicting cachexia in HCC patients, which were subsequently used to predict OS.
resultsCox regression analysis revealed a significant association between cachexia and worse OS. Both FLIS (0-4 vs. 5-6 points) (OR, 9.20; 95% CI: 4.68-18.10; P<0.001) and α-fetoprotein >100 ng/mL (OR, 4.08; 95% CI: 2.13-7.83; P<0.001) emerged as significant predictors of cachexia in patients with HCC. Furthermore, FLIS (0-4 vs. 5-6 points) (HR, 1.73; 95% CI: 1.19-2.51; P=0.004) was significantly associated with OS. Patients in the FLIS 0-4 points group had shorter OS than those in the FLIS 5-6 points group [20 months (95% CI, 14.7-25.3) vs. 43 months (95% CI, 27.7-58.3); P=0.001].
conclusionCachexia was associated with worse OS. The functional liver imaging score emerged as a significant predictor of cachexia in HCC patients and their prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39327388What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.