SynthesisMolecular biology reports2024
A systematic review on the selection of reference genes for gene expression studies in rodents: are the classics the best choice?
Synthesis in Molecular biology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Expression Patterns of Reference Genes in the Brains of Male Rats Subjected to CUMS-induced Depressive-like Behavior Strongly Depends on both the Age and the Specific Brain Region.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2026Article
- Identification and Validation of Tissue-Specific Housekeeping Markers for the Amazon River PrawnGenes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rodents are commonly used as animal models in studies investigating various experimental conditions, often requiring gene expression analysis. Quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) is the most widely used tool to quantify target gene expression levels under different experimental conditions in various biological samples. Relative normalization with reference genes is a crucial step in RT-qPCR to obtain reliable quantification results. In this work, the main reference genes used in gene expression studies among the three rodents commonly employed in scientific research-hamster, rat, and mouse-are analyzed and described. An individual literature search for each rodent was conducted using specific search terms in three databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. A total of 157 articles were selected (rats = 73, mice = 79, and hamsters = 5), identifying various reference genes. The most commonly used reference genes were analyzed according to each rodent, sample type, and experimental condition evaluated, revealing a great variability in the stability of each gene across different samples and conditions. Classic genes, which are expected to be stably expressed in both samples and conditions analyzed, demonstrated greater variability, corroborating existing concerns about the use of these genes. Therefore, this review provides important insights for researchers seeking to identify suitable reference genes for their validation studies in rodents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39327364What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.