Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39327344›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2025

Enhancing quality of life measurement: adapting the ASCOT easy read for older adults accessing social care.

James Caiels, Stacey Rand, Rasa Mikelyte, Lucy Webster, Elizabeth Field, Ann-Marie Towers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The adult social care outcomes toolkit easy read for older people (ASCOT-ER OP): an exploratory factor analysis and Rasch validation study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  3. Use of the adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT) in research studies: an international scoping review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

James CaielsPersonal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK. J.Caiels@kent.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5299-4682
Stacey RandPersonal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9071-2842
Rasa MikelyteCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Lucy WebsterPersonal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Elizabeth FieldKent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust, Gillingham, UK.
Ann-Marie TowersCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3597-1061

Funding

Research for Patient Benefit Programme NIHR202974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to adapt and assess the content validity of the ASCOT Easy Read (ASCOT-ER) for older people accessing social care.

methodsA co-production working group of 8 older social care users and their supporters was established to evaluate the comprehensibility and relevance of the ASCOT-ER images, wording and layout. Changes made by the working group were iteratively tested using cognitive interviewing techniques (think aloud) with 25 older social care users not able to self-complete the original ASCOT.

resultsCo-research with people with dementia and their supporters was critical to the development of an effective and accessible tool. Issues identified with comprehension, recall, judgement and response were addressed through iterative adjustments to design, layout and wording. An unexpected finding was that illustrations were disliked or disregarded by the majority of people, and, in particular, those living with dementia. This result contrasts with the typical assumption of easy read approaches, where illustrations are expected to enhance comprehension.

conclusionThe ASCOT-ER measure for older people is suitable for older people using social care services with mild to moderate dementia, mild cognitive impairment and other age-related needs. The revisions applied were designed to improve comprehension, judgement and response for this group and even those who were most cognitively impaired experienced fewer issues by the final round of testing. Nonetheless, some prompting was still required, particularly for those with higher levels of cognitive impairment and it is likely that some respondents will require the questionnaire to be administered in an interview format.

Indexed as

DementiaQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overComprehensionFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesCo-productionDementiaEasy readOlder adultsQuality of lifeSocial care

Identifiers

PMID39327344
PMCPMC11802674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.