Trial reportZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2024
[Cognitive training and physical therapy for fibromyalgia : Results of the KogTraP pilot study].
Trial report in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe effectiveness of additive cognitive training in groups to the standard physical-medical therapy for primary and secondary fibromyalgia syndrome (p/sFMS) and a subsequent home-based self-training phase (STP) was analyzed.
methodsIn the prospective controlled randomized study, 32 people with confirmed p/sFMS were included, whereby 4 patients could not be evaluated. During 2 weeks of acute inpatient therapy, the control group (CG; n = 12) received standard physical-medical therapy and the intervention group (IG, n = 16) also received social-communicative cognitive group training (once/day, 60 min). In the subsequent 3‑months, STP training was continued by both groups.
resultsOutcome parameters at baseline (U1), at discharge (U2), and after a quarter year (U3) were pain, well-being/depressive mood, general health, and cognitive parameters (memory functions, cognitive speed). Both groups showed significant pain relief (U2 vs. U1), which was 10% more in the IG. A significant improvement in mood could be seen in both groups, but only the IG no longer achieved depressive values in the follow-up (U3). An improvement in the general state of health was also detected in both groups, which was only maintained in the IG until the end of the STP. Cognitive performance remained the same in the IG at U2, while there was a reduction in the CG; cognitive speed could only be further improved in the IG during the STP. Adding cognitive training to a standard physical-medical clinical therapy resulted in significant pain relief and improvement of depression in patients during a hospital stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39327324What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.