Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39327309›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2024

Evaluation of the efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the treatment of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow in terms of symptoms and clinical and electrophysiological findings: a randomized, prospective, double-blind clinical trial.

Gülşah Çelik, Şebnem Koldaş Doğan, Meral Bilgilisoy Filiz

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gülşah ÇelikAntalya Training and Research Hospital: Antalya Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Antalya, Türkiye. gulsahberberr@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1170-4110
Şebnem Koldaş DoğanAntalya Training and Research Hospital: Antalya Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Antalya, Türkiye.
Meral Bilgilisoy FilizAntalya Training and Research Hospital: Antalya Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Antalya, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) is the second most common entrapment neuropathy and presents with symptoms such as pain, paresthesia, and weakness in the elbow. Provocative tests and electrophysiological examinations are helpful in the diagnosis of UNE. Low-level laser therapy is one of the conservative treatments of UNE however, limited results were reported on the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of UNE. In our study, we aimed to the efficacy of LLLT in reducing symptoms and providing clinical and electrophysiological improvement in patients with UNE. This study with a randomized-sham controlled, and double-blind design included 68 patients aged 18-60 years who were diagnosed with UNE. LLLT was applied to the first group, and sham laser was applied to the second group. The VAS pain, paresthesia, and weakness scores, grip strength, and provocative test positivity were evaluated in clinical examination. The QuickDASH questionnaire was administered to assess functional status. Electrophysiologically, motor distal latency (MDL) differences, sensory distal latency (SDL), motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity (NCV) were examined. Evaluations were performed before treatment and on the 15th day and at the third month after treatment. The LLLT group showed improvement in symptoms, clinical findings, motor NCV, and MDL at both post-treatment evaluations and sensory NCV on the post-treatment 15th day (p < 0.05). The comparison of post-treatment changes between the two groups revealed that the LLLT group had greater improvement in VAS day and night pain scores at both post-treatment evaluation times, QuickDASH scores at the third month, and sensory NCV on the 15th day (p < 0.05) compared to the SL group. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the post-treatment changes in VAS weakness scores, grip strength and electrophysiological findings (p > 0.05). It was observed that splinting alone was effective in UNE, but the addition of LLLT, one of the conservative treatment methods, enhanced treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

Low-Level Light TherapyUlnar NeuropathiesAdolescentAdultDouble-Blind MethodElbowFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural ConductionProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultElectroneuromyographyLow-level laser therapySplintUlnar nerve entrapment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.