Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39327300›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024

Utility of routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan in detecting filar cysts and follow-up outcomes.

Jingping Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jingping WuDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, 2 Yinghua East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China. 1098183571@qq.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1239-6658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the value of routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scans in detecting FCs, as well as the related ultrasound and clinical follow-up outcomes.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 1064 fetuses who underwent standardized ultrasound screening during the mid-trimester. During the examination, high-frequency ultrasound was used to examine the fetal spine. Different frequency ultrasound probes were used to compare and analyze the detection rates of FCs. We conducted follow-up ultrasound observations on all FCs and conducted long-term follow-up observations in terms of the motor function of the children after birth.

resultsAmong 1064 fetuses detected by ultrasound, a total of 910 fetuses were completely evaluated using high-frequency and low-frequency ultrasound, and 24 FCs were found. In all 24 cases of FCs, 7 cases were detected using low-frequency ultrasound, while high-frequency ultrasound detected all cases. There was a significant difference in the detection rates between the two groups (χ

conclusionRoutine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan detect FCs, particularly when high-frequency ultrasound probes were routinely applied. Most FCs detected by prenatal ultrasound spontaneously disappear and have no impact on the motor function of the fetus after birth (with the conus medullaris located at or above the L3 level). The shortest time interval from the detection to the disappearance of the cyst was 11 days.

Indexed as

CystsPregnancy Trimester, SecondUltrasonography, PrenatalAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansPregnancyRetrospective StudiesFilar cystFollow-up studiesPrenatal diagnosisUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID39327300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.