ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024
Bikini line one-anastomosis gastric bypass (BLOGB): initial report.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Port Site Placement and Outcomes for Surgical Obesity and Metabolic Surgeries (PSPOSO) Checklist: A New Reporting Checklist Based on Evidential Assessment of the Number of Trocars and Positions.Obesity surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Modified Bikini Line Sleeve Gastrectomy (MBLSG): Defining Surgical Landmarks and Clinical Outcomes in a Large-Scale Cohort of 906 Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Comparison of Early Results of Aesthetic Focused Bikini-Line Sleeve Gastrectomy and Standard Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Feasibility of aesthetic port placement in robot-assisted pyeloplasty a single institute study in all age groups.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Three-Port Bikini Line vs. Conventional Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study on Safety, Efficacy, and Aesthetic Outcomes.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Assessing the Safety and Aesthetic Benefits of Reduced Port Bikini-Line Sleeve Gastrectomy (RBSG): An Initial Report.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study introduces a new access method for one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) by placing ports at the bikini line.
objectiveTo describe our initial experience and assess the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of this novel access.
settingUniversity Hospital.
methodsThis prospective case-control study included 72 patients: 42 were allocated to the bikini line one-anastomosis gastric bypass (BLOGB) group, and 30 were assigned to the control group. Exclusion criteria included a history of major abdominal surgery, hiatal hernia, extensive lower abdominal adhesions, or a body mass index (BMI) exceeding 55 kg/m
resultsThe mean preoperative BMI of the study sample was 40.01 ± 2.84. Weight loss was satisfactory, with the highest percent excess weight loss (%EWL) observed at 12 months: 90.88 ± 7.90 and 91 ± 7.11 (p = 0.474) in both groups, respectively. Both groups showed no significant differences in operative complications, hospital stay, weight loss, or resolution of obesity-associated diseases. However, the BLOGB patients had a longer mean operative time of 110.71 ± 17.72 min compared to 98 ± 18.27 min in the control group (p = 0.002). Moreover, they experienced less postoperative pain and reported greater satisfaction with the appearance of their scars.
conclusionBLOGB was found to be potentially feasible, safe, and effective, offering improved aesthetic outcomes and reduced postoperative pain. This approach may be suitable for a select group of patients concerned with scar appearance. However, large-scale studies are necessary to ensure that safety is not compromised in pursuit of aesthetic benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.