Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39327279›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025

Does the Surgeon's Handedness Affect the Complications Rate in the Inframammary Approach Breast Augmentation?

Paolo Montemurro, Tarush Gupta

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paolo MontemurroAkademikliniken, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tarush GuptaDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India. drtarushgupta@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHumans show a preference for left or right handedness in most cases. For this reason, surgeons might find it more difficult to operate on the "nondominant breast", i.e. the breast opposite to the surgeon´s dominant hand (left breast for right-handed surgeons and right breast for left-handed surgeons). The nondominant breast might therefore potentially be prone to a higher complication rate.

methodRetrospective data of all consecutive patients who underwent breast augmentations by the first author over the past 15 years was reviewed. In all cases, the entire operation was carried out with the surgeon standing on the right side of the table. All the complications of the right and left breasts were analyzed individually.

results1707 patients with a minimum follow-up of six months were reviewed. Mean breast implant volume was 305.6 cc and mean follow-up was 16.12 months. A total of 151 complications were found (8.8%), including rotational deformity, capsular contracture, hematoma, seroma, bottoming out, high riding implant, double bubble deformity, implant rupture and infection. Of these complications, 77 (4.51%) affected the left breast, 48 (2.87%) were found on the right breast and 25 (1.46%) were bilateral. This difference was statistically significant.

conclusionSurgeons´ handedness seem to have an impact on the rate of complications after breast augmentation. As a result of some sort of unease when operating on the nondominant breast, this side might be prone to less precision during the dissection and, consequently, to more complications. Our study found that the rate of complications was higher in the nondominant breast. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Breast ImplantationFunctional LateralityMammaplastyPostoperative ComplicationsAdultBreast ImplantsCohort StudiesEstheticsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAugmentationBreastCapsular contractureComplicationDexterityHandedness

Identifiers

PMID39327279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.