ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Does the Surgeon's Handedness Affect the Complications Rate in the Inframammary Approach Breast Augmentation?
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHumans show a preference for left or right handedness in most cases. For this reason, surgeons might find it more difficult to operate on the "nondominant breast", i.e. the breast opposite to the surgeon´s dominant hand (left breast for right-handed surgeons and right breast for left-handed surgeons). The nondominant breast might therefore potentially be prone to a higher complication rate.
methodRetrospective data of all consecutive patients who underwent breast augmentations by the first author over the past 15 years was reviewed. In all cases, the entire operation was carried out with the surgeon standing on the right side of the table. All the complications of the right and left breasts were analyzed individually.
results1707 patients with a minimum follow-up of six months were reviewed. Mean breast implant volume was 305.6 cc and mean follow-up was 16.12 months. A total of 151 complications were found (8.8%), including rotational deformity, capsular contracture, hematoma, seroma, bottoming out, high riding implant, double bubble deformity, implant rupture and infection. Of these complications, 77 (4.51%) affected the left breast, 48 (2.87%) were found on the right breast and 25 (1.46%) were bilateral. This difference was statistically significant.
conclusionSurgeons´ handedness seem to have an impact on the rate of complications after breast augmentation. As a result of some sort of unease when operating on the nondominant breast, this side might be prone to less precision during the dissection and, consequently, to more complications. Our study found that the rate of complications was higher in the nondominant breast. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
39327279What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.