Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39327068›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2024

Presentation and characteristics of children with screen-detected type 1 diabetes: learnings from the ELSA general population pediatric screening study.

Lauren M Quinn, Renuka P Dias, Christopher Bidder, Sudeshna Bhowmik, Kerstin Bumke, Jaikumar Ganapathi, Shaun Gorman, Edward Hind, Swati Karandikar, Kiran Kumar and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Lauren M QuinnInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK l.quinn.1@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0500-4417
Renuka P DiasInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Christopher BidderDepartment of Child health, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.
Sudeshna BhowmikDepartment of Paediatrics, Arrowe Park Hospital, Wirral, UK.
Kerstin BumkePaediatric Department, University Hospital Wishaw, Wishaw, UK.
Jaikumar GanapathiHillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Uxbridge, UK.
Shaun GormanBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
Edward HindNorth Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.
Swati KarandikarBirmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Kiran KumarBurton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK.
Nicholas LipscombDepartment of Paediatrics, South West Acute Hospital, Enniskillen, UK.
Sheila McGovernSouth Eastern Health and Social Care Trust, Dundonald, UK.
Vijith R PuthiDepartment of Paediatrics, Peterborough City Hospital, Peterborough, UK.
Tabitha RandellNottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham, UK.
Gemma WattsQueen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK.
Parth NarendranInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4583-8793

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe describe the identification and management of general population screen-detected type 1 diabetes (T1D) and share learnings for best practice. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsChildren diagnosed with T1D through a general population screening initiative, the EarLy Surveillance for Autoimmune diabetes (ELSA) study, were reviewed and described.Parents provided written, informed consent for inclusion in the case series.

results14 children with insulin requiring (stage 3) T1D are described. These cases offer unique insights into the features of screen-detected T1D. T1D is identified sooner through screening programs, characterized by absent/short symptom duration, median presenting glycated hemoglobin 6.6% (49 mmol/mol) and insulin requirements<0.5 units/kg/day. ELSA identified four children at stage 3 and another 4 progressed within 4 months of ELSA completion, including two single seropositive children. Six children developed stage 3 T1D prior to ELSA completion, including two children (14%, n=2/14) with diabetic ketoacidosis prior to confirmed antibody status.

conclusionsThere are three main learnings from this case series. First, T1D identified through screening is at an earlier stage of its natural history and requires personalized insulin regimens with lower total daily insulin doses. Second, single autoantibody seropositivity can rapidly progress to stage 3. Finally, insulin requirement can manifest at any stage of the T1D screening pathway, and therefore early education around symptom recognition is essential for families participating in screening programs.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Mass ScreeningAdolescentAutoantibodiesBiomarkersChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlycated HemoglobinHumansInsulinMalePrognosisAutoantibodiesBiomarkersGlycated HemoglobinInsulinAntibodiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetic KetoacidosisScreening

Identifiers

PMID39327068
PMCPMC11429353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.