Trial reportBMJ open2024
Enhancing patient participation in discharge medication communication: a feasibility pilot trial.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo pilot test a co-designed intervention that enhances patient participation in hospital discharge medication communication.
designPilot randomised controlled trial.
settingOne tertiary hospital.
participantsPatients who were ≥45 years of age; ≥1 chronic illness and ≥1 regularly prescribed medication that they manage at home were recruited between October 2022 and May 2023. Healthcare professionals on participating units completed surveys.
interventionThe co-designed intervention included three websites: a medication search engine, a medication question builder and tools to facilitate medication management at home. Inpatient posters contained QR codes to provide access to these websites. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were the feasibility of study processes and intervention acceptability. Feasibility of study processes was measured in terms of recruitment, fidelity, retention, missing data and contamination. Patients in the intervention group and healthcare professionals on the wards self-reported intervention acceptability. Secondary outcomes were medication understanding, use, self-efficacy and healthcare utilisation.
results60 patients were recruited and randomised; half in each study group. The intervention was largely delivered as intended, and 99.7% of data collected was complete. In total, 16/59 (27.1%) patients were lost to follow-up 28 days after hospital discharge, and 3 patients in the usual care group reported that they saw the intervention poster prior to hospital discharge. 21 of 24 intervention group patients (87.5%) deemed the intervention acceptable, while half of the healthcare professionals (n=5, 50%) thought it was acceptable.
conclusionsWe demonstrated that in a future definitive trial, intervention fidelity would be high with little missing data, and patients would likely find the intervention acceptable. Thus, a larger trial may be warranted, as the intervention is implementable and approved by patients. However, additional strategies to increase recruitment and retention of eligible participants are needed. Healthcare professionals may require more preparation for the intervention to enhance their perceptions of intervention acceptability. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12622001028796.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.