Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39327047›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2024

Physicians' training and patient education initiative to improve quality of care decision communication at the emergency department.

Saskia Briedé, Tessa C van Charldorp, Joppe P Peerden, Karin Ah Kaasjager

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saskia BriedéInternal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands s.briede@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4673-2667
Tessa C van CharldorpDepartment of Languages, Literature and Communication, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Joppe P PeerdenIntensive Care Department, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Karin Ah KaasjagerDepartment of Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiscussions about care decisions, including code status documentation and advance care planning, are crucial components of patient-centred care. However, due to numerous barriers, these discussions are often avoided by both physicians and patients. As a result, these discussions often take place at the emergency department (ED). We aimed to improve the quality of care decision conversations in the internal medicine ED.

methodsThis pre-post intervention study was conducted at the internal medicine ED of a tertiary hospital in the Netherlands. Two interventions were implemented simultaneously: physician training and patient education. Physician training included an e-learning module and simulated patient sessions. Patients received a leaflet providing information about care decisions. Primary outcome was patient satisfaction with the care decision discussions, assessed using the Quality of Communication questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of patients recalling a care decision discussion, initiator of the discussion, leaflet recall, leaflet evaluation, prior care decision discussions and perceived appropriate timing for discussions.

results333 patients participated, 149 before and 184 after the interventions. Postintervention, there were significant improvements in patient-reported quality of care decision communication (p<0.001) and more patients recalled having care decision discussions (63.7% vs 45.9%, p=0.001). However, only 12% of patients recalled receiving the leaflet.

conclusionsImplementation of physician training and patient education significantly improved the quality of care decision conversations in our internal medicine ED. Despite low leaflet recall, the interventions demonstrated a notable impact on patient satisfaction with care decision discussions. Future research could explore alternative patient education methods and involve other healthcare professionals in initiating discussions. These findings underscore the importance of ongoing efforts to enhance communication in healthcare settings, particularly in emergency care.

Indexed as

CommunicationEmergency Service, HospitalPatient Education as TopicAdultAgedDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPatient-Centered CarePatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysiciansQuality ImprovementCommunicationEmergency departmentPatient-centred carePatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID39327047
PMCPMC11429346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.