Trial reportThe European respiratory journal2024
Efficacy and safety of selexipag in patients with inoperable or persistent/recurrent CTEPH (SELECT randomised trial).
Trial report in The European respiratory journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03689244 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Group-sequential, Adaptive, Phase 3 Study With Open-label Extension Period to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Selexipag as an add-on to Standard of Care Therapy in Subjects With Inoperable or Persistent/Recurrent After Surgical and/or Interventional Treatment Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Group-sequential, Adaptive, Phase 3 Study With Open-label Extension Period to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Selexipag as an add-on to Standard of Care Therapy in Subjects With Inoperable or Persistent/Recurrent After Surgical and/or Interventional Treatment Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Management of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Narrative Review of Treatment Selection and Sequencing.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Retrospective evaluation of Selexipag monotherapy on pulmonary hemodynamics in newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension prior to balloon pulmonary angioplasty.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
- Update on pulmonary hypertension.Respiratory research · 2026Review
- Research advances in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: from pathological mechanisms to multidisciplinary management.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Upfront combination therapy with sildenafil and ambrisentan in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSELECT was the first global randomised controlled trial of selexipag with standard of care in patients with inoperable or persistent/recurrent chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
methodsSELECT was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, group-sequential, phase 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03689244). Adults aged ≤85 years in World Health Organization Functional Class I-IV, with a 6-min walk distance of 100-450 m, were randomised (1:1) to receive selexipag (200-1600 µg twice daily titration until individual maximum tolerated dose)+standard of care or placebo+standard of care. Patients were recruited into the haemodynamic set (first 91 randomised patients to undergo right heart catheterisation (RHC); week 20) or non-haemodynamic cohort (remaining patients, no RHC required). The primary end-point was percent of baseline pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR; week 20). Safety was also assessed.
resultsOf 321 patients screened, 128 were randomised (haemodynamic set n=91 (selexipag n=47; placebo n=44)). In the haemodynamic set, 29 (31.9%) patients had previous pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), 20 (22.0%) balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA), and 14 (15.4%) both PEA and BPA; 28 (30.8%) were inoperable. The independent data monitoring committee recommended to stop the study for futility as no statistically significant difference was observed for the primary end-point (between-treatment geometric least squares mean ratio of PVR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.84-1.07; p=0.412). Adverse events were reported in 63 (98.4%) and 53 (82.8%) patients for selexipag and placebo, respectively.
conclusionsSELECT was discontinued for futility, as no treatment effect on the primary end-point (PVR) was observed. Safety data were consistent with the established safety profile of selexipag, with no new safety signals identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.