ArticleJournal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders2025
Renal autotransplant as a definitive treatment for nutcracker syndrome: A multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Autotransplantation for circum-aortic left renal vein compression after failed left renal vein transposition.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
- The continuing challenge of Nutcracker syndrome.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2026Article
- Beyond bladder clots: Unmasking nutcracker syndrome in refractory hematuria: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transposition of the left renal vein with three-dimensional image reconstruction for treatment of pediatric nutcracker syndrome: a case description and literature analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Controversies in treating nutcracker syndrome.CVIR endovascular · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveNutcracker syndrome is a rare condition that involves mechanical compression of the left renal vein, leading to chronic and debilitating left flank pain. The etiology of the pain is misdiagnosed frequently, and patients usually require long-term opioid use to manage their pain. Multiple therapeutic options for nutcracker syndrome have been described in the literature but the reports are limited by small numbers of patients, and the lack of convincing data demonstrating consistently improved outcomes. Here we report the largest series to date of patients undergoing renal autotransplantation for the treatment of nutcracker syndrome.
methodsWe performed a multicenter retrospective cohort review of patients 105 patients with nutcracker syndrome who underwent renal autotransplantation as a primary or salvage therapy.
resultsDuring the overall study period, 93.1% of patients treated with autotransplantation had durable, complete flank pain relief at 12 months with both open and robotic surgical approach. After autotransplantation, a statistically significant decrease in the percentage of patients using opioids from 48.6% to 17.0% was demonstrated at 12 months. In those patients using opioids before autotransplantation, a statistically significant decrease in morphine milligram equivalents was demonstrated from an alarming 68.9 ± 15.0 per day to 25.0 ± 11.02 morphine milligram equivalents per day.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that renal autotransplantation, as a primary treatment or a salvage treatment, in patients with nutcracker syndrome provides durable pain relief and a marked decrease in chronic opioid use regardless of surgical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.