Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39326009›Full record

Trial reportInflammatory bowel diseases2025

Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes With Etrasimod Treatment in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of Data From ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12.

Alessandro Armuzzi, David T Rubin, Stefan Schreiber, Julian Panés, Marc Fellmann, Lauren Bartolome, David Gruben, Martina Goetsch, Abhishek Bhattacharjee, María Chaparro and 1 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03945188 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 52-Week Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Etrasimod in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorArena PharmaceuticalsRan2019 to 2022Enrolled433ConditionsUlcerative ColitisArmsEtrasimod, Placebo
NCT03996369 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 12-Week Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Etrasimod in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorArena PharmaceuticalsRan2020 to 2021Enrolled354ConditionsUlcerative ColitisArmsEtrasimod, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alessandro ArmuzziIBD Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
David T RubinUniversity of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Stefan SchreiberDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Julian PanésFormerly Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigacíon Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Barcelona, Spain.
Marc FellmannPfizer AG, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0064-698X
Lauren BartolomePfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.
David GrubenPfizer Inc., Groton, CT, USA.
Martina GoetschPfizer AG, Zürich, Switzerland.
Abhishek BhattacharjeePfizer Healthcare India Pvt. Ltd, Chennai, India.
María ChaparroDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain.
Marla C DubinskySusan and Leonard Feinstein IBD Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4968-5795

Funding

Pfizer
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEtrasimod is an oral, once-daily (QD), selective sphingosine 1-phosphate1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Here, we evaluate the impact of etrasimod 2 mg QD on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with UC.

methodsThis post hoc analysis used data from the Phase 3 randomized controlled trials, ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12. HRQoL measures included: Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Ulcerative Colitis (WPAI:UC) completed at baseline, Week 12 (both trials), and Week 52 (ELEVATE UC 52 only). For IBDQ analyses, patients were stratified by prior exposure to biologics/Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) and baseline modified Mayo score (MMS; 4-6 or 7-9).

resultsGenerally, significantly greater proportions of patients receiving etrasimod (N = 527) vs placebo (N = 260) achieved IBDQ remission (IBDQ total score ≥170) and IBDQ response (IBDQ total score increase from baseline ≥16), with significant improvement in all IBDQ domain scores at Week 12 and maintained through Week 52. Significant differences in IBDQ remission and IBDQ response rates between etrasimod and placebo were more consistent among biologic/JAKi-naive patients vs those who were biologic/JAKi-experienced and in those with baseline MMS 7-9 vs 4-6. Significant improvements were observed in several SF-36 domain and summary scores and WPAI:UC domain scores at Week 12 and Week 52.

conclusionsEtrasimod 2 mg QD demonstrated significant and clinically meaningful improvements across multiple HRQoL measures, including WPAI, vs placebo. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03945188; NCT03996369.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeQuality of LifeSphingosine 1 Phosphate Receptor ModulatorsAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeSphingosine 1 Phosphate Receptor Modulatorsetrasimodhealth-related quality of lifesphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulatorulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID39326009
PMCPMC12166301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.