ReviewJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024
Advancements in synthetic CT generation from MRI: A review of techniques, and trends in radiation therapy planning.
Review in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utilization of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Synthetic Computed Tomography for Pedicle Screw Navigation in Children: A Feasibility Study.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026Article
- Application of synthetic computed tomography based on a deep learning model in pelvic radiotherapy planning: A feasibility study.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Optimizing the delivery of radiotherapy with artificial intelligence.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Online adaptive radiotherapy: International strategies for AI-enabled workflow efficiency and radiation therapist-led delivery for sustainable practice.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Equivariant conditional diffusion model for head and neck CT image synthesis from CBCT.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Image-based evaluation of a commercial AI synthetic CT generator for brain and prostate MR-only radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based generation of direct stopping power ratio maps for MR-only proton therapy of primary brain tumor patients.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Improved synthetic CT generation using surface scan information integrated into a deformable registration algorithm for limited Field of View data.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Synthetic CT imaging for pelvic and abdominal MR-only radiotherapy: Clinical validation on a 1.5T MR-Linac.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Comprehensive evaluation of a deep learning-based synthetic CT model for MR-only radiotherapy across multiple anatomical sites.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- An Adaptive Attention 3D U-Net for High-Fidelity MRI-to-CT Synthesis: Bridging the Anatomical Gap with CBAM.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Simulation-free spine palliative radiotherapy enabled by AI-adapted diagnostic CT.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Dental metal artifacts in magnetic resonance-based synthetic computed tomography for brain radiotherapy: Impact on dose, patient setup, and geometric distortion.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Dosimetric effect of abdominal compression in online adaptive planning for abdominal cancers treated with a 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance-guided linear accelerator.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Knowledge-based deep residual U-Net (DRU) for synthetic CT generation using a single MR volume for frameless radiosurgery.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Article
- 3D Latent Diffusion Model for MR-Only Radiotherapy: Accurate and Consistent Synthetic CT Generation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep Learning for CT Synthesis in Radiotherapy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Computed tomography (CT) are crucial imaging techniques in both diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. MRI provides excellent soft tissue contrast but lacks the direct electron density data needed to calculate dosage. CT, on the other hand, remains the gold standard due to its accurate electron density information in radiation therapy planning (RTP) but it exposes patients to ionizing radiation. Synthetic CT (sCT) generation from MRI has been a focused study field in the last few years due to cost effectiveness as well as for the objective of minimizing side-effects of using more than one imaging modality for treatment simulation. It offers significant time and cost efficiencies, bypassing the complexities of co-registration, and potentially improving treatment accuracy by minimizing registration-related errors. In an effort to navigate the quickly developing field of precision medicine, this paper investigates recent advancements in sCT generation techniques, particularly those using machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL). The review highlights the potential of these techniques to improve the efficiency and accuracy of sCT generation for use in RTP by improving patient care and reducing healthcare costs. The intricate web of sCT generation techniques is scrutinized critically, with clinical implications and technical underpinnings for enhanced patient care revealed. PURPOSE: This review aims to provide an overview of the most recent advancements in sCT generation from MRI with a particular focus of its use within RTP, emphasizing on techniques, performance evaluation, clinical applications, future research trends and open challenges in the field.
methodsA thorough search strategy was employed to conduct a systematic literature review across major scientific databases. Focusing on the past decade's advancements, this review critically examines emerging approaches introduced from 2013 to 2023 for generating sCT from MRI, providing a comprehensive analysis of their methodologies, ultimately fostering further advancement in the field. This study highlighted significant contributions, identified challenges, and provided an overview of successes within RTP. Classifying the identified approaches, contrasting their advantages and disadvantages, and identifying broad trends were all part of the review's synthesis process.
resultsThe review identifies various sCT generation approaches, consisting atlas-based, segmentation-based, multi-modal fusion, hybrid approaches, ML and DL-based techniques. These approaches are evaluated for image quality, dosimetric accuracy, and clinical acceptability. They are used for MRI-only radiation treatment, adaptive radiotherapy, and MR/PET attenuation correction. The review also highlights the diversity of methodologies for sCT generation, each with its own advantages and limitations. Emerging trends incorporate the integration of advanced imaging modalities including various MRI sequences like Dixon sequences, T1-weighted (T1W), T2-weighted (T2W), as well as hybrid approaches for enhanced accuracy.
conclusionsThe study examines MRI-based sCT generation, to minimize negative effects of acquiring both modalities. The study reviews 2013-2023 studies on MRI to sCT generation methods, aiming to revolutionize RTP by reducing use of ionizing radiation and improving patient outcomes. The review provides insights for researchers and practitioners, emphasizing the need for standardized validation procedures and collaborative efforts to refine methods and address limitations. It anticipates the continued evolution of techniques to improve the precision of sCT in RTP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.