ArticlePloS one2024
Prevalence and proportion by age and sex of chronic health conditions in a large healthcare system.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Internet Attachment-Based Compassion Therapy for Adults With Chronic Medical Conditions: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- Cirrhosis Risk in Sarcoidosis Without Documented Hepatic Involvement-A Large Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Article
- The effect of nurse care management on multimorbid patients' hospital utilization: a comparative-controlled trial and an exploratory cohort study.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Are Calculated Immune Markers with or Without Comorbidities Good Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Survival? The Results of a Longitudinal Study.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Observational
- Association Between the Healthy Eating Index and the Body Mass Index of Older Adults: An Analysis of Food Frequency and Preferences.Nutrients · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDisease prevalence and distribution by patient characteristics data are needed to guide "representative" patient enrollment in clinical trials and assess relevance of results to patient populations. Our objective was to describe disease prevalence, and age/sex distribution of patients with common chronic conditions from a large population sample.
methodsA cross-sectional study of all members of Clalit Health Services, alive on January 1, 2020. Included were 26 chronic diseases, and 21 types of malignancies regarded as active by being diagnosed between January 1, 2018- to January 1, 2020, or by prescription of oncologic treatment medications January 1, 2018 and January 1, 2020.
resultsData from 4,627,183 individuals, 2,274,349 males and 2,352,834 females from newborn to 110 years. Obesity (19%), hypertension (13%), diabetes mellitus (9%), esophagitis-gastritis (5.5%), thyroid disease (5.3%), asthma (5.1%), ischemic heart disease (4.5%), depression (4.5%), osteoporosis (3.8%), and atopic dermatitis (3.6%) were the ten most prevalent conditions. Proportions of age groups varied between conditions (67% of hypertensives were ≥65 years old, 24% ≥80 years; 73% with ischemic heart disease were ≥65 years, 29% ≥80 years; 59% of diabetics were ≥65 years, 17% ≥80 years; 42% of atrial fibrillation patients were ≥80 years; 40% of heart failure patients were ≥80 years). Proportions of males and females for most conditions paralleled prevalence except proportions of women increased after age 80 for cardiovascular diseases, and for diabetes after age 75. The five most frequent active cancers were breast, prostate, colon/rectal, lymphoma and melanoma. The prevalence of cancers increased with age beginning in the middle-aged groups and peaking at very old ages. Women had lower prevalence of lung cancers and accounted for lower percentages of patients with lung cancers (45 vs 55%) but similar percentages for women and men were seen in the patients with colon and rectal cancer (50.4 vs. 49.6% in women) and lymphoma (50.7 vs. 49.3% in women).
conclusionsPrevalence of medical conditions and distributions differ by age and sex. This information serves as an example and resource for data needed to describe a "representative" clinical population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.