ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2024
Development and deployment of a solid oral amphotericin B dosage form to treat visceral leishmaniasis within a pediatric population.
Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Formulation and evaluation of amphotericin B emulsion gel against Leishmania major in a murine model: parasite burden, gene expression, and histopathological profiling.Parasitology research · 2026Article
- Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in the Context of Global Travel, Migration, Refugee Populations, and Humanitarian Crises.Clinics and practice · 2025Review
- Beyond high cost: Pharmaceutic low-resource setting barriers to antibacterial access.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a severe and potentially fatal infection, with over 90% of reported cases occurring in East African countries including Chad, Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, and Uganda, affecting mainly impoverished individuals, and creating a significant economic burden. Currently, the intravenous single-dose liposomal amphotericin B is the first choice for the treatment of VL. Recently, WHO and DNDi have suggested a combination of intravenous liposomal amphotericin B and oral miltefosine as a potential approach to treat VL. However, miltefosine availability is uncertain, and its side effects frequently cause treatment to be discontinued. Furthermore, due to the difficult route of liposomal amphotericin B administration by intravenous infusion, the lack of formulation's tropical stability, accessibility, injection toxicity, and cost have prevented this injectable formulation of amphotericin B from reaching the most infected populations, particularly the pediatric population. To solve this problem, the development of a solid oral amphotericin B formulation that is cost-effective, safe, tropically stable, and easy to swallow, making it more accessible to children, particularly in rural communities having limited access to medical clinics or trained healthcare professionals is imperative. This viewpoint will discuss the opportunities and challenges of developing an oral amphotericin B formulation for a pediatric population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.