ArticleJMIR research protocols2024
Optimizing Detection and Prediction of Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis With Ambulatory Cognitive Tests: Protocol for the Longitudinal Observational CogDetect-MS Study.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05252195 (Optimizing Detection and Prediction of Changes in Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Optimizing Detection and Prediction of Changes in Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does Depressed Mood Affect Accuracy of Perceptions of Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis? The Role of Momentary Depressive Symptoms in the Correspondence Between Subjective and Objective Cognition in Multiple Sclerosis.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Examining the Impact of Perceived and Objective Cognitive Function on Social Participation in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Daily Temporal Associations Between Use of Psychoactive Substances and Fatigue, Pain, Stress, and Depressive Symptoms in People With Multiple Sclerosis.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Temporal Association Between Reported Use of Psychoactive Substances and Cognitive Function in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Associations between medication use and multiple domains of cognitive function in people with multiple Sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis and related disorders · 2026Article
- Understanding use and predictors of compensatory cognitive strategies in people with multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis and related disorders · 2025Article
- Review
- Feasibility, reliability, and validity of ambulatory smartphone-administered cognitive tests in multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCognitive dysfunction is a common problem in multiple sclerosis (MS). Progress toward understanding and treating cognitive dysfunction is thwarted by the limitations of traditional cognitive tests, which demonstrate poor sensitivity and ecological validity. Ambulatory methods of assessing cognitive function in the lived environment may improve the detection of subtle changes in cognitive function and the identification of predictors of cognitive changes and downstream effects of cognitive change on other functional domains.
objectiveThis paper describes the study design and protocol for the Optimizing Detection and Prediction of Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis (CogDetect-MS) study, a 2-year longitudinal observational study designed to examine short- and long-term changes in cognition, predictors of cognitive change, and effects of cognitive change on social and physical function in MS.
methodsParticipants-ambulatory adults with medically documented MS-are assessed over the course of 2 years on an annual basis (3 assessments: T1, T2, and T3). A comprehensive survey battery, in-laboratory cognitive and physical performance tests, and 14 days of ambulatory data collection are completed at each annual assessment. The 14-day ambulatory data collection includes continuous wrist-worn accelerometry (to measure daytime activity and sleep); ecological momentary assessments (real-time self-report) of somatic symptoms, mood, and contextual factors; and 2 brief, validated cognitive tests, administered by smartphone app 4 times per day. Our aim was to recruit 250 participants. To ensure standard test protocol administration, all examiners passed a rigorous examiner certification process. Planned analyses include (1) nonparametric 2-tailed t tests to compare in-person to ambulatory cognitive test scores; (2) mixed effects models to examine cognitive changes over time; (3) mixed effects multilevel models to evaluate whether ambulatory measures of physical activity, sleep, fatigue, pain, mood, and stress predict changes in objective or subjective measures of cognitive functioning; and (4) mixed effects multilevel models to examine whether ambulatory measures of cognitive functioning predict social and physical functioning over short (within-day) and long (over years) time frames.
resultsThe study was funded in August 2021 and approved by the University of Michigan Medical Institutional Review Board on January 27, 2022. A total of 274 adults with MS (first participant enrolled on May 12, 2022) have been recruited and provided T1 data. Follow-up data collection will continue through March 2026.
conclusionsResults from the CogDetect-MS study will shed new light on the temporal dynamics of cognitive function, somatic and mood symptoms, sleep, physical activity, and physical and social function. These insights have the potential to improve our understanding of changes in cognitive function in MS and enable us to generate new interventions to maintain or improve cognitive function in those with MS.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05252195; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05252195. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/59876.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.