Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39325460›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2024

Knowledge Graphs for drug repurposing: a review of databases and methods.

Pablo Perdomo-Quinteiro, Alberto Belmonte-Hernández

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pablo Perdomo-QuinteiroGrupo de Aplicación de Telecomunicaciones Visuales, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Avenida Complutense 30, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8784-0907
Alberto Belmonte-HernándezGrupo de Aplicación de Telecomunicaciones Visuales, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Avenida Complutense 30, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4009-2662

Funding

European ProjectHorizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme 101057619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug repurposing has emerged as a effective and efficient strategy to identify new treatments for a variety of diseases. One of the most effective approaches for discovering potential new drug candidates involves the utilization of Knowledge Graphs (KGs). This review comprehensively explores some of the most prominent KGs, detailing their structure, data sources, and how they facilitate the repurposing of drugs. In addition to KGs, this paper delves into various artificial intelligence techniques that enhance the process of drug repurposing. These methods not only accelerate the identification of viable drug candidates but also improve the precision of predictions by leveraging complex datasets and advanced algorithms. Furthermore, the importance of explainability in drug repurposing is emphasized. Explainability methods are crucial as they provide insights into the reasoning behind AI-generated predictions, thereby increasing the trustworthiness and transparency of the repurposing process. We will discuss several techniques that can be employed to validate these predictions, ensuring that they are both reliable and understandable.

Indexed as

Drug RepositioningAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualHumansartificial intelligencedrug repurposingexplainabilitygraph networksknowledge graphs

Identifiers

PMID39325460
PMCPMC11426166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.