Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39325427›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Emergent time scales of epistasis in protein evolution.

Leonardo Di Bari, Matteo Bisardi, Sabrina Cotogno, Martin Weigt, Francesco Zamponi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Epistatic drift in protein evolution.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025
    Review
  9. Constrained Evolutionary Funnels Shape Viral Immune Escape.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Protein evolution as a complex system.Nature chemical biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leonardo Di BariDipartimento Scienza Applicata e Tecnologia, Politecnico di Torino, I-10129 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-4537-2125
Matteo BisardiSorbonne Université, CNRS, Institut de Biologie Paris-Seine, Laboratoire de Biologie Computationnelle et Quantitative, Paris F-75005, France.ORCID 0009-0003-7693-5240
Sabrina CotognoSorbonne Université, CNRS, Institut de Biologie Paris-Seine, Laboratoire de Biologie Computationnelle et Quantitative, Paris F-75005, France.
Martin WeigtSorbonne Université, CNRS, Institut de Biologie Paris-Seine, Laboratoire de Biologie Computationnelle et Quantitative, Paris F-75005, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0492-3684
Francesco ZamponiDipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9260-1951

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce a data-driven epistatic model of protein evolution, capable of generating evolutionary trajectories spanning very different time scales reaching from individual mutations to diverged homologs. Our in silico evolution encompasses random nucleotide mutations, insertions and deletions, and models selection using a fitness landscape, which is inferred via a generative probabilistic model for protein families. We show that the proposed framework accurately reproduces the sequence statistics of both short-time (experimental) and long-time (natural) protein evolution, suggesting applicability also to relatively data-poor intermediate evolutionary time scales, which are currently inaccessible to evolution experiments. Our model uncovers a highly collective nature of epistasis, gradually changing the fitness effect of mutations in a diverging sequence context, rather than acting via strong interactions between individual mutations. This collective nature triggers the emergence of a long evolutionary time scale, separating fast mutational processes inside a given sequence context, from the slow evolution of the context itself. The model quantitatively reproduces epistatic phenomena such as contingency and entrenchment, as well as the loss of predictability in protein evolution observed in deep mutational scanning experiments of distant homologs. It thereby deepens our understanding of the interplay between mutation and selection in shaping protein diversity and functions, allows one to statistically forecast evolution, and challenges the prevailing independent-site models of protein evolution, which are unable to capture the fundamental importance of epistasis.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticEvolution, MolecularModels, GeneticMutationProteinsSelection, GeneticProteinsepistasisgenerative probabilistic modelsprotein evolutionsequence landscapes

Identifiers

PMID39325427
PMCPMC11459137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.