Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39325353›Full record

SynthesisInfection2025

A systematic review of dalbavancin efficacy as a sequential therapy for infective endocarditis.

Gabriele Maria Leanza, Emanuele Rando, Federico Frondizi, Eleonora Taddei, Francesca Giovannenze, Juan P Horcajada, Giancarlo Scoppettuolo, Carlo Torti

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Dalbavancin for infective endocarditis: A systematic review of effectiveness, safety, and dosing.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Infective endocarditis: it takes a team.European heart journal · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gabriele Maria Leanza *Dipartimento di Sicurezza e Bioetica - Sezione di Malattie Infettive, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Emanuele Rando *Dipartimento di Sicurezza e Bioetica - Sezione di Malattie Infettive, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Federico FrondiziDipartimento di Sicurezza e Bioetica - Sezione di Malattie Infettive, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy. federico.frondizi@guest.policlinicogemelli.it.
Eleonora TaddeiDipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Francesca GiovannenzeDipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Juan P HorcajadaHospital del Mar. Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Pompeu Fabra University (UPF), Barcelona, SpainCIBER of Infectious Diseases (CIBERINFEC CB21/13/00002), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Giancarlo ScoppettuoloDipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Carlo TortiDipartimento di Sicurezza e Bioetica - Sezione di Malattie Infettive, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDalbavancin is an antibiotic characterized by an extended half-life and efficacy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococci. Currently, there are only narrative reviews summarizing the evidence about the use of dalbavancin for infective endocarditis (IE), many of which are focused primarily on its use as consolidation therapy. For this reason, we conducted a systematic review to describe the clinical efficacy and the safety of dalbavancin in IE treatment.

methodsWe searched for available evidence using the MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science libraries, with no restrictions regarding the publication year. The risk of bias was performed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool for the comparative studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for descriptive studies.

resultsNine studies were included. All of them were observational. Native valve endocarditis was the most common kind of IE found in the studies' populations (128/263, 48.7%), followed by prosthetic valve endocarditis, and cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related endocarditis. Coagulase-negative Staphylococci were the most common pathogens isolated (83/269, 30.1%), followed by S. aureus, Enterococci spp and Streptococci spp. Five out of nine studies documented a clinical failure rate of less than 10%. Dalbavancin showed a favourable safety profile. Dalbavancin appears to be a promising option for the consolidation therapy of IE. However, further studies comparing dalbavancin with standard of care are needed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023430032.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsEndocarditisEndocarditis, BacterialTeicoplaninHumansTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsdalbavancinTeicoplaninDalbavancinGram-positiveInfective endocarditisLong acting antibioticsSequential therapy

Identifiers

PMID39325353
PMCPMC11825564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.