Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39325298›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024

Pain outcomes of outside-the-cage robotic thoracic surgery: a prospective matched-cohort study.

Arthur Streit, Lyndon C Walsh, Florent Stasiak, Nicolas Vautrin, Philippe Guerci, Joseph Seitlinger, Stéphane Renaud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arthur StreitDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Régional, Institute Lorrain du Cœur et des Vaisseaux Louis Mathieu, Universitaire de Nancy, 4th Floor, 5 Rue du Morvan, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54500, Nancy, France.
Lyndon C WalshDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Régional, Institute Lorrain du Cœur et des Vaisseaux Louis Mathieu, Universitaire de Nancy, 4th Floor, 5 Rue du Morvan, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54500, Nancy, France.
Florent StasiakDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Régional, Institute Lorrain du Cœur et des Vaisseaux Louis Mathieu, Universitaire de Nancy, 4th Floor, 5 Rue du Morvan, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54500, Nancy, France.
Nicolas VautrinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy, Nancy, France.
Philippe GuerciDepartment of Anesthesiology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy, Nancy, France.
Joseph SeitlingerDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Régional, Institute Lorrain du Cœur et des Vaisseaux Louis Mathieu, Universitaire de Nancy, 4th Floor, 5 Rue du Morvan, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54500, Nancy, France.
Stéphane RenaudDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Régional, Institute Lorrain du Cœur et des Vaisseaux Louis Mathieu, Universitaire de Nancy, 4th Floor, 5 Rue du Morvan, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54500, Nancy, France. s.renaud@chru-nancy.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Management of acute and chronic pain after thoracic surgery for pulmonary resection or thymectomy remains a challenge for both thoracic surgeons and anesthesiologists. Advances in minimally invasive robotic procedures have made subcostal outside-the-cage (OTC) resections possible, but the procedure's pain benefits have not been previously measured. A single-center cohort was consented to undergo robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) with an OTC or transthoracic (TT) approach. On every post-operative day (POD), patients were asked to complete the visual analog scale (VAS) of pain, assigning a score of 0-10 with higher scores equaling higher pain intensity. Additionally, patients' opioid consumption was recorded and classified using morphine equivalent dose (MED). Descriptive statistics of demographics, Mann-Whitney, and Chi-squared tests were performed in a matched analysis. Altogether, 50 OTC patients and 50 TT patients were included. For each group, 1 pneumonectomy, 19 lobectomies, 10 segmentectomies, and 20 thymectomies were performed. Between groups, most were male (n = 54; p = 0.42) and there were no differences in American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (p = 0.51), or tobacco consumption (p = 0.45). Patients who received an OTC approach experienced significantly lower pain scores on POD-0 (p = 0.001), POD-1 (p < 0.001), and POD-2 (p < 0.001). POD-3 OTC VAS scores were not different from those of the TT group (p = 0.09). Similarly, MED was lower for the OTC group on POD-0 (p < 0.001), POD-1 (p = 0.03), and POD-3 (p = 0.03). The RATS-OTC approach results in a more rapid decrease in self-reported pain by the patient as well as significantly lower levels of MED.

Indexed as

Pain MeasurementPneumonectomyPostoperative PainRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedAnalgesics, OpioidCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesThoracic Surgical ProceduresThymectomyTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidMinimally invasive surgeryOutside the cagePainRobotic surgerySubcostal thoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID39325298
PMCPMC11427510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.