Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39325246›Full record

ArticlePsicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS2024

Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of human-robot interaction self-efficacy scale in Chinese adults.

Huixin Gao, Wei Wang, Chengli Huang, Xinru Xie, Duming Wang, Wei Gao, Jie Cai

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huixin Gao *Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, 928 2nd Street, Xiasha Higher Education Park, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4462-8620
Wei Wang *Naval Medical Center of PLA, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8938-2751
Chengli HuangSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5215-6734
Xinru XieDepartment of Psychology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, 928 2nd Street, Xiasha Higher Education Park, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6694-3827
Duming WangDepartment of Psychology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, 928 2nd Street, Xiasha Higher Education Park, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2320-0753
Wei GaoDepartment of Psychology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, 928 2nd Street, Xiasha Higher Education Park, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-8056-339X
Jie CaiDepartment of Psychology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, 928 2nd Street, Xiasha Higher Education Park, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. 874929328@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9175-3048

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the fast-paced advancements of robot technology, human-robot interaction (HRI) has become increasingly popular and complex, and self-efficacy in HRI has received extensive attention. Despite its popularity, this topic remains understudied in China.

objectiveIn order to provide a psychometrically sound instrument in China, this study aimed to translate and validate the Self-Efficacy in Human-Robot Interaction Scale (SE-HRI) in two Chinese adult samples (N1 = 300, N2 = 500).

methodsThe data was analyzed by SPSS 26.0 and Amos 24.0. Item analysis and exploratory factor analysis were conducted using Sample 1 data. Confirmatory factor analysis, criterion-related validity analysis, and reliability analysis were then performed using Sample 2 data.

resultsThe results revealed that the Chinese SE-HRI scale consisted of 13 items in a two-factor model, suggesting a good model fit. Moreover, general self-efficacy and willingness to accept the use of artificial intelligence (AI) were both positively correlated with self-efficacy in HRI, while negative attitudes toward robots showed an inverse correlation, proving the Chinese SE-HRI scale exhibited excellent criterion-related validity.

conclusionThe Chinese SE-HRI scale is a reliable assessment tool for evaluating self-efficacy in HRI in China. The study discussed implications and limitations, and suggested future directions.

Indexed as

Human–robot interactionReliabilitySelf-efficacyValidity

Identifiers

PMID39325246
PMCPMC11427644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.