Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39325245›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2024

Echocardiography for Management of Cardiovascular Disease in Pregnancy.

Mary Rodriguez Ziccardi, Joan E Briller

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mary Rodriguez ZiccardiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, 840 S. Wood St. (Mc 715), Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Joan E BrillerDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, 840 S. Wood St. (Mc 715), Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. briller@UIC.edu.

Funding

(1/2) Randomized Evaluation of Bromocriptine in Myocardial Recovery Therapy for Peripartum Cardiomyopathy (REBIRTH)UG3HL153847 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MCNAMARA, DENNIS M. · 2021 to 2021
$528k
Discrimination of object orientation by visual cortexF31NS043148 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ROLLENHAGEN, JULIANNE E · 2002 to 2003
$64k
NHLBI NIH HHS UG3 HL153847NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS043148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewCardiovascular disease (CVD) continues to be a leading contributor to maternal mortality and morbidity. Echocardiography is an essential tool for patients with suspected and known CVD to establish symptom etiology, treatment strategy, and prognosis. We summarize the current status of conventional and novel techniques for assessment of CVD during pregnancy. RECENT

findingsConventional techniques are still useful for evaluation of known or suspected CVD. Advanced technology using speckle tracking continues to evolve and is increasingly applied for diagnosis of subclinical disease including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Precise recommendations on how frequently echocardiography should be performed and for whom remain in flux. However, a recently published consensus statement and new screening tool for pregnancy assessment of patients with valvular heart disease provide additional advice on using this modality. Echocardiography remains the diagnostic modality of choice for evaluation and risk stratification in pregnancy.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHeart Valve DiseasesHumansPregnancyPrognosisRisk AssessmentVentricular Dysfunction, LeftCardio-obstetricsEchocardiographyGlobal longitudinal strainHypertensive disorders of pregnancyPregnancy-associated heart failureRisk stratification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.