ReviewArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Orthogeriatric co-management in pelvic and acetabular fractures.
Review in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel stacked double-plate fixation with quadrilateral surface buttress screws for osteoporotic acetabular fractures in elderly patients: a prospective pilot case series study evaluating clinical and radiological outcomes.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Observational study on the comparability of the clinical profiles of older adults with hip fractures and pelvic fractures in Germany.Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2026Article
- Pelvic insufficiency fractures in the elderly - what insights has the past year of research brought? A narrative review.Innovative surgical sciences · 2025Review
- Future directions in the treatment of pelvic fractures with abdominal organ injury: the potential of combined endovascular embolization and external fixation techniques.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsteoporosis, age and frailty significantly impacts outcomes in fragility fractures of the pelvis, increasing morbidity and mortality. Identifying frailty aids in risk stratification and personalized care plans, enhancing recovery and reducing complications in older adults. Orthogeriatric co-management, an interdisciplinary approach combining orthopedics and geriatrics, optimizes care for older adults with fragility fractures. This model improves outcomes through integrated preoperative and postoperative care. This study examines the current literature for orthogeriatric co-management in pelvic ring or acetabular fractures, aiming to improve outcomes for older adults.
conclusionOrthogeriatric co-management can be an effective tool to significantly enhances clinical care and reduces complications in older adults with pelvic ring and acetabular fractures. Studies demonstrate increased detection of urological complications and earlier patient mobilisation, alongside a notable decrease in revision surgery rates. The implementation of a specialized framework underscores the necessity for standardised orthogeriatric protocols, optimizing patient outcomes and satisfaction. Integrating geriatric expertise in surgical treatment addresses comorbidities more effectively and minimizes postoperative complications. The certification of such centers ensures adherence to quality standards, fostering continuous improvement in care. Standardised orthogeriatric management should extend to all older fracture patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39325163What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.