ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025
Screening a new set of microhaplotypes in exonic regions for sample identity testing and paternity testing during whole exome sequencing analysis.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Whole exome sequencing (WES) is widely used in clinical diagnosis. Before obtaining an accurate diagnosis, it is essential to conduct sample identity testing and paternity testing on trio samples. Currently, there is a lack of optimal genetic markers for these purposes, with limited literature available in this area. Microhaplotypes (MHs) are promising genetic markers due to their high polymorphism, low mutation rate, short amplified fragments, absence of stutter and amplification bias. These characteristics make them suitable for sample tracking and paternity testing during WES analysis. In this study, we screened out a set of polymorphic MHs in exonic regions for the above purposes. The results showed that the power of discrimination (PD) and probability of exclusion (PE) of this set of markers ranged from 0.2682 to 0.8878 and 0.0178 to 0.4583, respectively. Both the cumulative power of discrimination (CPD) and cumulative probability of exclusion (CPE) exceeded 0.999999, indicating the great value of these markers in paternity testing and individual identification in the study population. However, these markers had the effective number of alleles (A
Indexed as
Identifiers
39325160What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.