Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39325149›Full record

Trial reportBJS open2024

Impact of laparoscopic training course for surgical trainees based on an evidence-based pedagogical framework: randomized trial.

Ruijun Pan, Xueliang Zhou, Chao Wu, Luyang Zhang, Jiayu Wang, Minhua Zheng, Ting Shi, Wei Cai, Jing Sun

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BJS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ruijun PanDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xueliang ZhouDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chao WuDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Luyang ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jiayu WangTeaching and Research Section of Simulation in Healthcare, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Ruijin Clinical School, Shanghai, China.
Minhua ZhengDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ting ShiTeaching and Research Section of Simulation in Healthcare, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Ruijin Clinical School, Shanghai, China.
Wei CaiDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jing SunDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

Key Project of Medical Engineering Committee of Shanghai Society of Integrative Medicine and Western Medicine YG202313National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871984Research Physician Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine 826304Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine DLY201504Shanghai Municipal Health Commission Clinical Research project of health industry 201940013Shanghai Science and Technology Commission 20JC1410100Shanghai Science and Technology Commission biomedical science and technology support project 19441917200Shanghai Science and Technology Commission Special Project on Biomedical Science and Technology Support for Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan 22S31904000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 'Learn, See, Practice, Prove, Do, Maintain' (LSPPDM) pedagogical framework is an evidence-based framework developed through a careful review and synthesis of the literature. The purpose of the study was to explore the effectiveness and applicability of the LSPPDM pedagogical framework in the laparoscopic training course for surgical residents.

methodsProspective study of surgical residents who underwent standardized surgical residency training in a single institution from December 2020 to December 2022. Trainees were randomized to either the pedagogical group (6-step LSPPDM pedagogical framework) or traditional group (2-step traditional approach with twice-weekly lectures and a weekly laparoscopic operating skills session). The Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills scale was used for technical skills, and the Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons assessment form was used for non-technical skills.

resultsSixty trainees were randomized. The pedagogical group scored higher on subjective perception (P < 0.050) and the theoretical assessment (mean(s.d.) 41.83(6.66)) than those in the traditional group (37.83(5.77)) (P = 0.016). Trainees in the pedagogical group took less time to complete the assessment of models, had fewer failures and higher scores, took less time to complete laparoscopic sutures and knots, showed better proficiency with laparoscopic instruments, and completed at higher quality (P < 0.050). Trainees performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in animal models demonstrated higher technical and non-technical skill scores in the pedagogical group (P < 0.050). 'Tissue handling' and 'Decision making' were common areas for improvement for both groups of trainees.

conclusionsThe LSPPDM pedagogical framework is feasible and demonstrated improvements in technical and non-technical skills in surgical trainees compared to a traditional training programme.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceInternship and ResidencyLaparoscopyAdultCurriculumEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleHumansMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39325149
PMCPMC11426165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.