Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39325031›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of anaesthesiology2025

Positive end-expiratory pressure and emergence preoxygenation after bariatric surgery: effect on postoperative oxygenation: A randomised controlled trial.

Erland Östberg, Alexander Larsson, Philippe Wagner, Staffan Eriksson, Lennart Edmark

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of anaesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04150276 (Zero Positive End-expiratory Pressure Before Emergence Improves Postoperative Oxygenation in Obese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery - a Randomized Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04150276 nacompletednot on this map

Zero Positive End-expiratory Pressure Before Emergence Improves Postoperative Oxygenation in Obese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery - a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion VästmanlandRan2019 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsOxygenationArmsZEEP during awakening, PEEP during awakening
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erland ÖstbergFrom the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, and Centre for Clinical Research, Västmanland Hospital Västerås, Sweden; Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (EÖ, AL, LE), Region Västmanland - Uppsala University, Centre for Clinical Research, Västmanland Hospital Västerås, Sweden (PW), and Department of Surgery and Centre for Clinical Research at Västmanland Hospital Västerås, Sweden; Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden (SE).
Alexander Larsson
Philippe Wagner
Staffan Eriksson
Lennart Edmark

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPositive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is important to increase lung volume and counteract airway closure during anaesthesia, especially in obese patients. However, maintaining PEEP during emergence preoxygenation might increase postoperative atelectasis by allowing susceptible lung areas to be filled with highly absorbable oxygen that gets entrapped when small airways collapse due to the sudden loss of PEEP at extubation.

objectiveThis study aimed to test the hypothesis that withdrawing PEEP just before emergence preoxygenation would better maintain postoperative oxygenation.

designProspective, randomised controlled trial.

settingSingle centre secondary hospital in Sweden between December 2019 and January 2023. PATIENTS: A total of 60 patients, with body mass index between 35 and 50 kg m -2 , undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

interventionIntraoperative ventilation was the same for all patients with a fixed PEEP of 12 or 14 cmH 2 O depending on body mass index. No recruitment manoeuvres were used. After surgery, patients were allocated to maintained PEEP or zero PEEP during emergence preoxygenation.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was change in oxygenation from before awakening to 45 min postoperatively as measured by estimated venous admixture calculated from arterial blood gases.

resultsBoth groups had impaired oxygenation postoperatively; in the group with PEEP maintained during awakening, estimated venous admixture increased by mean 9.1%, and for the group with zero PEEP during awakening, estimated venous admixture increased by mean 10.6%, difference -1.5% (95% confidence interval -4.6 to 1.7%), P  = 0.354. Throughout anaesthesia, both groups exhibited low driving pressures and superior oxygenation compared with the awake state.

conclusionsWithdrawing PEEP before emergence preoxygenation, did not alter early postoperative oxygenation in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Intraoperative oxygenation was excellent despite using fixed PEEP and no recruitment manoeuvres, but deteriorated after extubation, indicating a need for future studies aimed at improving the emergence procedure. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER AND REGISTRY: www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT04150276.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryOxygenPositive-Pressure RespirationAdultAnesthesia Recovery PeriodFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSwedenOxygen

Identifiers

PMID39325031
PMCPMC11620321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.