Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39324739›Full record

ArticleOtolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2025

Are Otolaryngologists Seeing More Cough? Longitudinal Trends and Patterns.

James R Xu, Anirudh Saraswathula, Paul C Bryson, Thomas L Carroll, Lee M Akst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Scientometric analysis of trends in research in laryngopharyngeal reflux.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

James R XuCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7420-2842
Anirudh SaraswathulaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Paul C BrysonDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Thomas L CarrollDepartment of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lee M AkstDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOtolaryngologists play an increasing role in managing cough, but little data exists examining the demographics of this patient population and the referral patterns that influence their access to care. This study sought to elucidate these factors using a longitudinal, nationwide database to minimize sampling bias and identify trends representative of the national population. STUDY

designNationally representative survey.

settingNational Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS).

methodsVisits with a diagnosis and chief complaint of cough between 2005 and 2019 in NAMCS were examined. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to compare patient demographics between visits to surgical specialists, medical specialists, and primary care physicians.

resultsOtolaryngologists made up more than 84% of surgical specialist visits. There was a 0.52% [0.20%-0.84%] increase per year in the proportion of visits attributed to surgical specialists. Based on a sensitivity analysis of the multivariable model, Hispanic patients (adjusted odds ratio, aOR: 0.88 [0.78-0.99] vs White) and patients living outside of metropolitan areas (aOR: 0.77 [0.61-0.99] vs living within) were less likely to see surgical specialists than primary care doctors for their cough. Patients who were referred (aOR: 1.47 [1.28-1.72] vs not referred) and with chronic cough (aOR: 1.47 [1.23-1.75] vs acute/subacute) were more likely to see a surgical specialist.

conclusionOtolaryngologists are increasingly called upon to evaluate and consider treatment for cough. Identifying patient groups with limited access underscores the need for enhanced education about otolaryngologists' roles and integrated care approaches to improve access to specialized cough treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

Indexed as

CoughOtolaryngologistsOtolaryngologyPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAgedFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationUnited Stateschronic coughcoughdemographicsepidemiologylaryngologyNAMCS

Identifiers

PMID39324739
PMCPMC11773429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.