Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39324625›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2024

Rate of body weight gain during early gestation in F0 beef heifers has effects that extend multigenerationally to the F2 fetuses.

Friederike Baumgaertner, Germán Darío Ramírez-Zamudio, Ana Clara B Menezes, Isabella M Jurgens, Mara R Hirchert, Jennifer L Hurlbert, Kerri A Bochantin-Winders, Wellison J S Diniz, Lawrence P Reynolds, Alison K Ward and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Friederike BaumgaertnerDepartment of Animal Sciences, Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.
Germán Darío Ramírez-ZamudioDepartment of Animal Sciences, Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.
Ana Clara B MenezesDepartment of Animal Sciences, Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.
Isabella M JurgensDepartment of Animal Sciences, Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.
Mara R HirchertDepartment of Animal Sciences, Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.
Jennifer L HurlbertDepartment of Animal Sciences, Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.
Kerri A Bochantin-WindersDepartment of Animal Sciences, Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.
Wellison J S DinizDepartment of Animal Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1082-5535
Lawrence P ReynoldsDepartment of Animal Sciences, Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.
Alison K WardDepartment of Animal Sciences, Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.
Pawel P BorowiczDepartment of Animal Sciences, Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.
S R UnderdahlDepartment of Animal Sciences, Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.
James D KirschDepartment of Animal Sciences, Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.
Sheri T DorsamDepartment of Animal Sciences, Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.
Kevin K SedivecCentral Grasslands Research Extension Center, North Dakota State University, Streeter, ND 58483, USA.
Kendall C SwansonDepartment of Animal Sciences, Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5694-4778
Joel S CatonDepartment of Animal Sciences, Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.
Carl R DahlenDepartment of Animal Sciences, Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4556-4315

Funding

Research CoresP20GM103442 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA · PI Donald A. Sens · 2012 to 2026
$53.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our aim was to investigate the effects of maternal (F0) body weight (BW) gain during the first 84 d of gestation on body composition, ovarian reserve, and hormonal and metabolic parameters of breeding-age F1 heifers, as well as the BW and morphometry of F2 fetuses. The study also evaluated the effect of maternal BW gain (F0) on the mRNA relative abundance of the small intestine of both F1 heifers and F2 fetuses. Crossbred Angus heifers (F0; n = 100) were managed to gain 0.20 kg/d (low gain [LG], n = 50) or 0.75 kg/d (moderate gain [MG], n = 50) for the first 84 d of gestation. Subsequently, F0 dams were managed on a common forage-based diet for the rest of gestation until the weaning of the F1 offspring. At 15 mo of age, a subset of F1 heifers was randomly selected for the current experiment (n = 8 LG and n = 8 MG). Heifers were bred via artificial insemination (AI; day 0), then harvested on day 84 of gestation. On days -10, 42, and 84, BW was recorded, and blood was collected and analyzed for concentrations of glucose, non-esterified fatty acids, progesterone, insulin, and insulin-like growth factor-1. The weight of F1 carcasses, organs, gravid uteri, and F2 fetuses and organs were recorded at harvest. Visible follicles were counted on F1 ovaries at harvest, and histology was used to count microscopic follicles. Liver and jejunal samples from F1 heifers were collected to measure tissue oxygen consumption and jejunal samples from F1 heifers and F2 fetuses were collected for mRNA relative abundance analysis. BW of F1 heifers from MG dams tended to be 12 kg greater (P = 0.06) than for F1 heifers from LG dams. Concentrations of glucose were greater (P = 0.03) in F1 heifers from the MG group, with no differences in other blood metabolites or follicular populations (P ≥ 0.16). Interestingly, mammary glands were heavier (P = 0.05), and placentas and body depth tended to be heavier and greater, respectively (P ≤ 0.10), for F2 fetuses from F0 LG heifers. Oxygen consumption in the liver and jejunum, as well as mRNA relative abundance in the jejunum of F1 heifers, were not affected by F0 rate of gain (P ≥ 0.16). However, the NDUFC1, SDHA, UQCR1, and PPARG genes were upregulated (P ≤ 0.05) in the jejunum of F2 fetuses from the LG group. In conclusion, BW gain of F0 heifers during early gestation exerts subtle effects on pre-breeding BW and blood metabolites in F1 offspring, with impacts present in F2 placenta, mammary gland, and intestine.

Indexed as

Body CompositionAnimalsBlood GlucoseCattleFemaleFetusGestational Weight GainIntestine, SmallPregnancyWeight GainBlood Glucosebeef heiferenergy supplementationfetal organ weightsmaternal organ weightsmultigenerational programming

Identifiers

PMID39324625
PMCPMC11503215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.