Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39324391›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of STD & AIDS2025

Sexual and domestic violence enquiry: A national exploratory survey of asking and telling in sexual health services in the UK.

Jane Meyrick, Amy Bennett, Kyle McGovern, Charlotte Kite

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of STD & AIDS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jane MeyrickUniversity of the West of England, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2510-9251
Amy BennettSurrey, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust/BASHH Sexual Violence SIG Representative, Guildford, UK.
Kyle McGovernUniversity of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Charlotte KiteUniversity of the West of England, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGender-based violence in the form of domestic and sexual abuse represent a worldwide public health and civil rights issue. Healthcare and sexual health have a central role to play in prevention, particularly in the identification of sexual and domestic violence/abuse within a frontline service in which it often presents. Survivors of sexual violence and abuse commonly pass through sexual health services without being asked about their victimisation. Healthcare should be able to identify survivors, provide first line support, refer to specialist services and link to comprehensive post assault care.

methodsIn the first joint study of its kind, the Univeristy of the West of England worked with the British Association for Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH) and their Sexual Violence Specialist Interest Group (SVSIG). We report the findings of a snapshot, non-probability, exploratory survey of current comparative sexual and domestic violence/abuse enquiry practice in Genito Urinary Medicine services across the UK.

resultsSixty-two responding services evidenced variable practice around asking, collating data, referral, training and staff supervision.

conclusionsThis benchmarking study of practice in the UK sets a bar against which all services can measure and improve current practice on gender-based violence identification, a crucial role of sexual health services in reducing the inequalities driven harm of undisclosed trauma.

Indexed as

Domestic ViolenceSex OffensesSexual HealthFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomscreeningSexual/domestic violencesexual health services

Identifiers

PMID39324391
PMCPMC11667950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.