Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39324286›Full record

ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2024

In Vitro Models for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.

Jarin Tusnim, Peter Kutuzov, Jonathan M Grasman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nerve tissue model on a micropatterned surface: Axon guidance and neural regeneration.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Differential Effects of Calcium Alginate and Carboxymethylcellulose Wound Dressing Extracts on Human Sensory Neuron Regeneration and Secretome.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jarin TusnimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
Peter KutuzovDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
Jonathan M GrasmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8289-9627

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR003018 · NCATS · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL/HEALTH SCIENCES-RBHS · PI CHAN, JOHN R., HALM, ETHAN A · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
Acellular composite hydrogel scaffolds for volumetric muscle regenerationR21AR079708 · NIAMS · NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GRASMAN, JONATHAN M., KUMAR, VIVEK · 2022 to 2023
$467k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003018NCATS NIH HHS KL2-TR003018New Jersey Health Foundation PC14-22NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR079708NIAMS NIH HHS R21-AR079708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) resulting in lesions is highly prevalent clinically, but current therapeutic approaches fail to provide satisfactory outcomes in many patients. While peripheral nerves have intrinsic regenerative capacity, the regenerative capabilities of peripheral nerves are often insufficient to restore full functionality. This highlights an unmet need for developing more effective strategies to repair damaged peripheral nerves and improve regenerative success. Consequently, researchers are actively exploring a variety of therapeutic strategies, encompassing the local delivery of trophic factors or bioactive molecules, the design of advanced biomaterials that interact with regenerating axons, and augmentation with nerve guidance conduits or complex prostheses. However, clinical translation of these technologies remains limited, emphasizing the need for continued research on peripheral nerve regeneration modalities that can enhance functional restoration. Experimental models that accurately recapitulate key aspects of peripheral nerve injury and repair biology can accelerate therapeutic development by enabling systematic testing of new techniques. Advancing regenerative therapies for PNI requires bridging the gap between basic science discoveries and clinical application. This review discusses different in vitro models of peripheral nerve injury and repair, including their advantages, limitations, and potential applications.

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationPeripheral Nerve InjuriesPeripheral NervesAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsHumansBiocompatible Materialsin vitro modelsperipheral nerve injuryperipheral nerve regeneration

Identifiers

PMID39324286
PMCPMC13023161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.