Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39324177›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2024

Reliability of the spot urine protein/creatinine ratio for assessing proteinuria in patients with renal disease.

Fengmei Huang, Xiaojie Xie, Manqin Wang, Xiaofang Tong, Ruiqi Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fengmei HuangDepartment of Nephrology, Yingtan 184 Hospital, Jiangxi Province, China.
Xiaojie XieDepartment of Nephrology, Yingtan 184 Hospital, Jiangxi Province, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9298-7401
Manqin WangDepartment of Nephrology, Yingtan 184 Hospital, Jiangxi Province, China.
Xiaofang TongDepartment of Nephrology, Yingtan 184 Hospital, Jiangxi Province, China.
Ruiqi WuDepartment of Nephrology, Yingtan 184 Hospital, Jiangxi Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the reliability of the spot urine protein/creatinine (sP/Cr) ratio for evaluating proteinuria across different ranges and renal functions.

methodsIn this retrospective study, we analyzed 24-hour urine protein excretion (24 h UP) and sP/Cr measurements in 216 patients with renal disease. Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses were performed to evaluate the correlation and agreement between 24 h UP and the sP/Cr.

resultsThe patients were categorized into the following three 24 h UP groups: 150 to 299 mg/24 hours, 300 to 3499 mg/24 hours, and >3500 mg/24 hours. Significant positive correlations were found between the sP/Cr and the first two 24 h UP groups (r = 0.9104 and r = 0.9721, respectively) but not between the third group (r = 0.3110). Bland-Altman analysis confirmed good agreement in the group with <3500 mg/day proteinuria. Estimated glomerular filtration rates ≥60 mL/minute and <60 mL/minute were significantly correlated with the sP/Cr (r = 0.8714 and r = 0.4516, respectively).

conclusionThe sP/Cr ratio is a reliable indicator for non-nephrotic proteinuria, irrespective of renal function, but is unreliable for nephrotic-range proteinuria.

Indexed as

CreatinineGlomerular Filtration RateProteinuriaAdultAgedFemaleHumansKidney DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesUrinalysisCreatinine24-hour urine proteincorrelationestimated glomerular filtration ratenephrotic-range proteinuriarenal functionSpot urine protein/creatinine ratio

Identifiers

PMID39324177
PMCPMC11437542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.