Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39324164›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

National survey questionnaire on the diagnosis and treatment status of

Zongdan Jiang, Yaokun Ding, Chao Li, Zhenyu Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zongdan Jiang *Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Yaokun Ding *Department of Emergency, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Chao LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Zhenyu ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: The Maastricht VI/Florence Consensus and Chinese National Consensus Report provide comprehensive guidelines for treating Methods: Chinese medical staff attending gastrointestinal conferences across various regions were selected for this study. The questionnaire included: 1. the number of patients with peptic ulcer bleeding in hospitals of different levels annually and the diagnostic methods used for Results: Across all levels of Chinese hospitals, the urea breath test was the most commonly used method for detecting Conclusion: There is a need for an enhanced understanding of and adherence to guidelines for

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriPeptic Ulcer HemorrhageAmoxicillinBreath TestsChinaDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial Agentsconsensusdifferent level hospitalsHelicobacter pyloripeptic ulcer bleedingquestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID39324164
PMCPMC11422099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.