Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39324153›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2024

Systematic review of statistical methods for the identification of buildings and areas with high radon levels.

Joan F Rey, Sara Antignani, Sebastian Baumann, Christian Di Carlo, Niccolò Loret, Claire Gréau, Valeria Gruber, Joëlle Goyette Pernot, Francesco Bochicchio

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Joan F ReyWestern Switzerland Center for Indoor Air Quality and Radon (croqAIR), Transform Institute, School of Engineering and Architecture of Fribourg, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Sara AntignaniItalian National Institute of Health - National Center for Radiation Protection and Computational Physics, Rome, Italy.
Sebastian BaumannAustrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Department of Radon and Radioecology, Linz, Austria.
Christian Di CarloItalian National Institute of Health - National Center for Radiation Protection and Computational Physics, Rome, Italy.
Niccolò LoretItalian National Institute of Health - National Center for Radiation Protection and Computational Physics, Rome, Italy.
Claire GréauInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Bureau d'Etude et d'expertise du Radon, IRSN, PSE-ENV, SERPEN, BERAD, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Valeria GruberAustrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Department of Radon and Radioecology, Linz, Austria.
Joëlle Goyette PernotWestern Switzerland Center for Indoor Air Quality and Radon (croqAIR), Transform Institute, School of Engineering and Architecture of Fribourg, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Francesco BochicchioItalian National Institute of Health - National Center for Radiation Protection and Computational Physics, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radon is a natural and radioactive noble gas, which may accumulate indoors and cause lung cancers after long term-exposure. Being a decay product of Uranium 238, it originates from the ground and is spatially variable. Many environmental (i.e., geology, tectonic, soils) and architectural factors (i.e., building age, floor) influence its presence indoors, which make it difficult to predict. However, different methods have been developed and applied to identify radon prone areas and buildings. This paper presents the results of a systematic literature review of suitable statistical methods willing to identify buildings and areas where high indoor radon concentrations might be found. The application of these methods is particularly useful to improve the knowledge of the factors most likely to be connected to high radon concentrations. These types of methods are not so commonly used, since generally statistical methods that study factors predictive of radon concentration are focused on the average concentration and aim to identify factors that influence the average radon level. In this paper, an attempt has been made to classify the methods found, to make their description clearer. Four main classes of methods have been identified: descriptive methods, regression methods, geostatistical methods, and machine learning methods. For each presented method, advantages and disadvantages are presented while some applications examples are given. The ultimate purpose of this overview is to provide researchers with a synthesis paper to optimize the selection of the method to identify radon prone areas and buildings.

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorRadonAir Pollutants, RadioactiveHumansRadiation MonitoringAir Pollutants, RadioactiveRadongeostatisticsmachine learningpublic healthradon prone areas and buildingstatistic

Identifiers

PMID39324153
PMCPMC11422083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.