ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2024
Automated Screening of Hip X-rays for Osteoporosis by Singh's Index Using Machine Learning Algorithms.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Intelligent identification of osteoporosis on hip X-rays using vision transformer.Bone reports · 2026Article
- A Deep Learning and Explainable AI-Based Approach for the Classification of Discomycetes Species.Biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Osteoporosis is a significant and growing global public health problem, projected to increase in the next decade. The Singh Index (SI) is a simple, semi-quantitative evaluation tool for diagnosing osteoporosis with plain hip radiographs based on the visibility of the trabecular pattern in the proximal femur. This work aims to develop an automated tool to diagnose osteoporosis using SI of hip radiograph images with the help of machine learning algorithms. Methods: We used 830 hip X-ray images collected from Indian men and women aged between 20 and 70 which were annotated and labeled for appropriate SI. We employed three state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms-Vision Transformer (ViT), MobileNet-V3, and a Stacked Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-for image pre-processing, feature extraction, and automation. Each algorithm was evaluated and compared for accuracy, precision, recall, and generalization capabilities to diagnose osteoporosis. Results: The ViT model achieved an overall accuracy of 62.6% with macro-averages of 0.672, 0.597, and 0.622 for precision, recall, and F1 score, respectively. MobileNet-V3 presented a more encouraging accuracy of 69.6% with macro-averages for precision, recall, and F1 score of 0.845, 0.636, and 0.652, respectively. The stacked CNN model demonstrated the strongest performance, achieving an accuracy of 93.6% with well-balanced precision, recall, and F1-score metrics. Conclusion: The superior accuracy, precision-recall balance, and high F1-scores of the stacked CNN model make it the most reliable tool for screening radiographs and diagnosing osteoporosis using the SI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.