ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2024
Genetic landscape of ESBL producing international clone ST410 of
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Escherichia coli causing bloodstream infections in Mexican paediatric patients: molecular typing, antimicrobial resistance, virulence factors, and clinical features.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Novel Variant of New Delhi Metallo-Beta-Lactamase (Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The emergence of ESBLs producing cephalosporin-resistant Methods: 29 Results: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing demonstrated a high level of resistance to cephalosporins followed by aminoglycoside, sulfonamide, carbapenem and penicillin group of antibiotics. However, n=20/29 shows MDR phenotype. Phylogenetic group B2 (n=15) dominated, followed by group D (n=7), group A (n=4), and group B1 (n=3). Serotyping analysis identified O1:H7 (n=8), O2:H1 (n=6), O8:H4 (n=5), O16:H5 (n=4), and O25:H4 (n=3). Other serotypes identified included O6:H1, O15:H5, and O18:H7 (n=1 each). The most commonly detected ESBL genes were Conclusion: The ST410 clone exhibited a complex resistance profile, diverse serotypes, the presence of specific resistance genes (ESBL genes), virulence gene repertoire, and diverse plasmids. The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.