ArticleJournal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
Implementation of socially assistive robots in geriatric care institutions: Healthcare professionals' perspectives and identification of facilitating factors and barriers.
Article in Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Health Care Professionals' Perspectives of Socially Assistive Robots in Health Care Settings: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Exploring fear in human-robot interaction: a scoping review of older adults' experiences with social robots.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence-Supported Virtual Nursing at Home: A Systematic Review.Florence Nightingale journal of nursing · 2026Article
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives on usefulness, acceptability and implementation conditions of socially assistive robots in France: a cross-sectional survey and cluster analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Long-term care residents and staff perspectives on PARO using video-reflexive ethnography (VRE).Frontiers in dementia · 2026Article
- Integrating a Large Language Model Into a Socially Assistive Robot in a Hospital Geriatric Unit: Two-Wave Comparative Study on Performance, Engagement, and User Perceptions.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Implementation of New Technologies in an Aged Care Social Day Program: Mixed Methods Evaluation.JMIR aging · 2025Article
- SHARA-WoZ: A multistakeholder framework to evaluate socially assistive robots thought Wizard of the Oz methods.Digital healthArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The successful integration of socially assistive robots in geriatric care settings hinges on the attitudes and opinions of healthcare professionals. This study explored their needs, expectations, and perceptions regarding robot use, including facilitating factors and barriers to implementation. Methods: Twenty professionals participated in semi-structured interviews that covered topics such as robot applications, perceived value, acceptance criteria, prerequisites for deployment, ethical considerations, and design attributes. These interviews were analyzed using a deductive qualitative approach guided by the European Network for Health Technology Assessment model (version 3.0). Results: Results indicated that professionals generally viewed robots favorably, noting their usefulness in various non-intimate tasks like meal assistance and toileting. Ease of use was identified as a critical factor for robot adoption in geriatric care. Furthermore, the necessity of educating all stakeholders and providing comprehensive training to professionals emerged as essential for successful implementation. The discussions also included financial and ethical issues related to the introduction of these technologies. Conclusion: These findings will contribute to develop guidelines for designing and deploying socially assistive robots that align with the preferences and requirements of geriatric care professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.