ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2024
Test-retest reproducibility of absolute myocardial blood flow obtained using stress dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent highlights from the International Journal of Cardiology Heart & Vasculature: cardiometabolic disease.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) and coronary microvascular disease (CMD) are significant contributors to angina pectoris, necessitating reliable diagnostic techniques for effective management. While positron emission tomography has been the non-invasive gold standard for myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification, stress dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CTMPI) has emerged as a promising alternative. This study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reproducibility of MBF measurements obtained using dynamic CTMPI. Methods: The study retrospectively analyzed MBF values from two dynamic CTMPI examinations conducted in the same patient cohort (n = 30) to examine the consistency of MBF quantification and the ability to visually detect and grade abnormal perfusion suggesting ischemia between the tests. Global and remote MBF were defined as the mean MBF and the maximum MBF of all segments, respectively. Results: MBF quantification revealed strong linear correlations between the tests (r = 0.89 for global MBF, r = 0.88 for remote MBF, and r = 0.82 for all segments), and intraclass correlation coefficients reflected high agreement between the tests (0.94 for global MBF, 0.93 for remote MBF, and 0.90 for all segments). Bland-Altman plots indicated a negligible mean difference with acceptable limits of agreements between the tests for global MBF, remote MBF, and all segments. Visual assessment of the CTMPI maps for abnormal perfusion suggesting ischemia yielded a good inter-test agreement with a weighted kappa value of 0.80. Conclusion: Dynamic CTMPI can consistently reproduce absolute MBF values and reliably detect myocardial perfusion abnormalities, potentially making it a robust diagnostic tool for evaluating the presence and severity of CAD and CMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.