ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2024
Efficacy and safety of serrapeptase on ankle sprain cases: A single center prospective comparative study.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy of high-dose serrapeptase (serratiopeptidase) in inflammation among orthopedic trauma patients.Journal of medicine and life · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) rank among the frequently prescribed medications for addressing pain and inflammation. Although they are powerful pain relievers, their side effects are indisputable. Serrapeptase, a serine protease, exhibits anti-inflammatory and anti-oedemic activity without the side effects of NSAIDs. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of serrapeptase in the treatment of pain and edema in ankle sprains. Methods: In a single-centre prospective comparative study, 76 patients aged 18-53 with Grade II ankle sprains were assigned to either a serrapeptase intervention group (n = 38) receiving 5 mg serrapeptase (two tablets, three times per day) for ten days, or a control group (n = 38) receiving 500 mg paracetamol (three times per day) for the same duration. Ankle joint edema was assessed using both Figure-of-Eight and water-displacement methods. Pain was assessed with Visual Analogue Scale (V.A.S.). Within-groups and between-groups analyses were performed in the 3rd and 10th day. Results: Both groups exhibited reduced edema and pain over time. Serrapeptase demonstrated a superior reduction in ankle joint edema on the third and tenth day compared to paracetamol, while pain management did not differ significantly. Conclusion: Serrapeptase exhibited better efficacy than paracetamol in reducing ankle joint edema, highlighting its potential as an alternative treatment. Level of evidence: Level II, prospective comparative trial without randomization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.