Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39323998›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Comparative assessment of the diagnostic efficacy of [

Jian Yang, Yong Wu, Yanyin Zhang, Xiang Peng, Chengzhi Jiang, Wanjing Zhou, Jiashun Dai, Aimin Xie, Hui Ye, Kai Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Diagnostic Efficacy of FAPI-PET/CT Versus [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jian Yang *PET/CT Center, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital Of Xiangya School Of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yong Wu *PET/CT Center, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital Of Xiangya School Of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yanyin Zhang *PET/CT Center, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital Of Xiangya School Of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiang PengPET/CT Center, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital Of Xiangya School Of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Chengzhi JiangPET/CT Center, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital Of Xiangya School Of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Wanjing ZhouPET/CT Center, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital Of Xiangya School Of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jiashun DaiPET/CT Center, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital Of Xiangya School Of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Aimin XiePET/CT Center, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital Of Xiangya School Of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Hui YePET/CT Center, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital Of Xiangya School Of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Kai ZhengPET/CT Center, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital Of Xiangya School Of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of [ Methods: This single-center retrospective clinical study was performed at Hunan Cancer Hospital between December 2020 and June 2022. The participants underwent both [ Results: Forty-seven patients (27 males, aged 25-68 years) with gastric cancer after curative resection (27 with adenocarcinoma, 17 with signet ring cell carcinoma and 4 with mucinous adenocarcinoma) were included in the study. [ Conclusion: [

Indexed as

[18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04[18F]FDGgastric cancerPET/CTrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID39323998
PMCPMC11422010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.