Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39323993›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Comparative study of CAD/CAM reconstruction and miniplates for patient-specific fixation in LCL-type mandibular reconstruction.

Philipp Lampert, Jakob Fenske, Jonas Wüster, Steffen Koerdt, Kilian Kreutzer, Philipp Ruf, Sara Checa, Max Heiland, Claudius Steffen, Carsten Rendenbach

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Philipp LampertCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany.
Jakob FenskeCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany.
Jonas WüsterCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany.
Steffen KoerdtCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany.
Kilian KreutzerCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany.
Philipp RufCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany.
Sara ChecaBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Julius Wolff Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Max HeilandCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany.
Claudius Steffen *Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany.
Carsten Rendenbach *Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Miniplates offer superior clinical handling and facilitate postoperative removal after mandibular reconstruction but unfavorable load distribution under high stress has been shown. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcome of patient-specific 3D-printed (PS-3D) titanium miniplate with reconstruction plate fixation in three-segmental LCL-type reconstructions for the first time. Methods: Patients undergoing three-segmental LCL-type mandibular reconstruction after malignant tumor resection between April 2017 and July 2023 were analyzed in a retrospective single-center study. Inclusion criteria were primary reconstruction using a fibula free flap and PS-3D titanium mini- or reconstruction plate fixation. Complication rates were recorded and analyzed within 6 months after surgery using the N - 1 Chi Results: 38 patients (10 females, 28 males; mean age 61.4 ± 7.6 years) met the inclusion criteria. In 14 patients (36.8%) miniplates were used in the anterior region. Rates of fixation failure, plate exposure, incomplete osseous union, wound infection, soft tissue, and overall complications did not differ significantly between the two plate systems. Conclusion: Complication rates did not differ significantly between PS-3D mini- and reconstruction plates in three-segmental LCL-type mandibular reconstructions. Given their advantages in clinical handling and postoperative removal, PS-3D miniplates can be a viable alternative also in larger mandibular reconstructions.

Indexed as

3D-printingCAD/CAMfibula flapmandibular reconstructionminiplatepatient-specificpseudarthrosistitanium plate

Identifiers

PMID39323993
PMCPMC11422126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.