ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Outpatient Management of Fever and Neutropenia in Low-risk Children with Solid Tumors: A Quality Improvement Initiative.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Management of febrile neutropenia in pediatric oncology usually requires inpatient parenteral antibiotics after initial evaluation, but some patients at lower risk of sepsis could be safely managed outpatient. We describe a quality improvement project to increase outpatient management of fever and neutropenia. Methods: We designed a standardized algorithm for children with a solid tumor diagnosis and low risk for bacteremia. The aim was to achieve outpatient management for at least 80% of eligible patients within 20 months of project initiation. We used plan-do-study-act cycles to improve algorithm compliance, including optimizing medical record decision support, developing targeted educational materials and outreach, and restructuring outpatient processes to allow for close follow-up. We surveyed patients (age ≥12 y) and parents/caregivers to assess the impact of outpatient management. Results: The initiative led to 71% (n = 34) of eligible patients being managed as outpatients. Six percent (n = 2) of patients developed bacteremia, resulting in hospital admission. Fifteen of 26 parents/caregivers and five of 11 patients approached completed the survey. For the preferred setting of febrile neutropenia management, 83% of patients preferred to be home versus 40% of parents/caregivers. No patient expressed any of the three highest ratings in the question exploring fear regarding outpatient febrile neutropenia management versus 67% of parents/caregivers. Conclusions: Some children with a solid tumor diagnosis at low risk for bacteremia are safely managed for febrile neutropenia as outpatients. Targeted efforts to engage parents/caregivers early in this practice change are necessary for success.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.